Buckeyeshaman said:
Was looking at the new coaster name Vulcan. 415 ft., 103mph.
Um. What? "The" new coaster name Vulcan? Not sure what this even means.
Valravn would have been better if the leak had not happen [sic].
And not sure what this means. How would a coaster that doesn't yet exist be "better" if there were no leak? How would that affect the physical structure of a currently non-existent ride?
I'm a Marxist, of the Groucho sort.
Thought I would bring this article back up:
http://www.sanduskyregister.com/entertainment/attractions/7372776
It begs the question--- what happened to the tunnel? Budget cuts?
I know I sound annoying at this point--- but I just want them to add a damn tunnel. I can see them wanting the first drop to be open so that guests can watch, but the second half of the ride is just over grass. Dropping off of the midcourse brake into darkness would be epic.
Tilt-a-Whirl said:
It begs the question--- what happened to the tunnel? Budget cuts?
The article also missed on the height, speed, length, and number of inversions.
You have to remember the article had described just ONE version of what they were considering. B&M and other companies design multiple layouts and they go from there. Bryan Edwarda was quoted I believe saying that was an option they were looking at. So its no surprise the article was partially right but obviously had an older memo.
Shawn Meyer said:
I agree with Thabto(Brian). If they can paint Rougarou in a month, they can paint Raptor in the same amount of time. I imagine for Raptor though, they'll wait until the park is officially closed for the season.
With Rougarou, they closed the ride near Labor Day. Raptor is too popular to do that, I'd think.
This Facebook page is saying that Raptor will get a new lighting package. But they also say that Cedars eyesore isn't being removed until about 2 more years.
Brian
Valravn Rides: 24| Steel Vengeance Rides: 27| Dragster Rollbacks: 1
You must be logged in to postArchived.