Hell, had it been me, I'd have settled for a pass valid for the rest of the season and called it even.
You ride the ride, you should consider all risks involved, not saying CP isn't a safe park, but accidents happen when we least expect them. It's horrible for the people that experienced it, yes, but from what I understood from a local news broadcast (Detroit) all of the riders were fine, and still alive.
Walking away with a minor injury is something ALL of them should be grateful for. Could have been worse.
And again, if the metal shavings were as small as they say, I doubt that pictures of the ride would give much away.
/considers self lucky, was on Dragster just 2 days ago
twitter.com/tommy_penner
Ravine Flyer II - The Gravity Group does it again.
On one hand, the article stated that the who police saw theese injuries (if you can even call them that) stated the appeared to be bee sting sized. So it isnt even that big of a deal, except for the one lady here whos husband got one in the eye. All they need to do is put a cover over the cable.
On the other hand, Dragster has been nothing but trouble from the beginning, it was always something. Now we have reports of people actually getting injured on the ride, cables breaking, wheels coming off and such. I think this is a sign of what is yet to come, we dont want dragster to become one of those six flags death machines. Ill also say that from the beginning I was very skeptical towards TTD, i beleive it stole the spotlight from Magnum and MF, in my opinion its not a real coaster to begin with, its more of a ride. Dont get me wrong, its a awesome experience, but is that experience worth someones life further down the line? *** Edited 7/14/2004 3:56:58 AM UTC by NextGen89***
278 coasters and still counting!
Jeff said:
How is it not that big a deal?
Jeff, relatively speaking, I don't think it is that big of a deal. No malfunction that causes an injury is good obviously, but this wasn't something like a high speed collision or a life threatening structural failure. I look at it as about the same as when the chain on the Corkscrew cut up a few people when it broke and piled up in front of the train.
It does seem like Dragster is wearing out cables very quickly though. Speculation, but maybe the bull-wheel at the launch point is a little too small in diameter? A cable fraying from a too sharp bend caused a fatal accident at Vail many years ago. One of the gondola lifts had a car derail when the track cable was frayed and the car fell to the ground. Maybe the cable problems with Dragster come from a similar engineering miscalculation.
I'd rather be in my boat with a drink on the rocks,
than in the drink with a boat on the rocks.
Walt said:I seem to think these kids would not be holding a news conference if this wasn't the world's tallest and fastest coaster that had already been in the news for its maintenance woes. But that's just my impression. Like I said, I could be way off.
I saw the same TV news reports and I tend to agree with Walt's viewpoint. The kids seemed like they were over dramatic and just trying to cash in on the situation. One person seemed like he had a few pin pricks, that may just be mostly acne. I received far worse wire injuries on my hand once changing a tire that was worn down to the steel cord, and I grabbed the wrong place on the tire by mistake.
I'd rather be in my boat with a drink on the rocks,
than in the drink with a boat on the rocks.
And even if CP can get it running reliably for a while, what's to say that it won't fail again with even more disastrous results? This is what, it's THIRD cable (correct me if I'm wrong)? That's like having to replace all of the brake lines on your car twice a year. Do you really want to drive a car like that? Knowing that whatever is causing your brake lines to fail could happen any time?
And then of course there is the money side of this. A downed coaster generates no revenue, it only turns people away. Know what does an even better job of discouraging riders? Any coaster that hurts or kills people. I'm certain that far less people are willing to ever ride TTD after this, and that hurts park attendance. Also, CP is losing a lot of money fixing and maintaining a ride that constantly breaks. Any modifications that may be attemped to finally fix what ails the Dragster, will (would?) cost money. Cedar Point is not getting its $25 million out of this ride.
I realize that CP has been doing EVERYTHING it can to get TTD to run as good as it can. I know that new technology and extreme height and speed equal rough roads at first. Perhaps, with extensive reworking, Dragster can run again and run good. I would insist on extensive, comprehensive testing before being reopened. But sometimes flaws are inherent in a design, engineered in and can't be reasonably engineered out. Maybe CP and Intamin should just learn from this, tear down TTD, and build something in its place. Something better, that makes us forget Top Thrill Dragster ever even existed.
NextGen89 said:
cables breaking, wheels coming off and such.
What wheels?
Beer and golf Thursday thru Monday, Cedar Point & beer, Tuesday and Wednesday.
Can you see One-Eyed-Willie from the top of Magnum?
Pete said:
I saw the same TV news reports and I tend to agree with Walt's viewpoint. The kids seemed like they were over dramatic and just trying to cash in on the situation. One person seemed like he had a few pin pricks, that may just be mostly acne.
I saw the same report, and yes the injuries did look very minor. They pointed out though they were riding in the back of the train, and the those who rode up front were more seriously injured. It sounds like the whole train was subject to be hit by debris, and the front of the train got the most of it.
My Friend also said that if they didn't have it running very good by the end of this year it would be torn down... I didn't believe him on that one... as that was a rumor last year, but if anyone has any clarifications, they would be greatly appreciated.
TTD: 7 (Rollbacks seen: 32)
MF: 22
WT: 10
MilleniumMadMan said:
I have to agree (hesitantly), TTD may be a LEMON. Granted, new technology inevitably has it teething problems. But a year and a half? That may be small fries when you're building a moon rocket, but let's be reasonable. It's as if Intamin did NO testing!
And even if CP can get it running reliably for a while, what's to say that it won't fail again with even more disastrous results? This is what, it's THIRD cable (correct me if I'm wrong)? That's like having to replace all of the brake lines on your car twice a year. Do you really want to drive a car like that? Knowing that whatever is causing your brake lines to fail could happen any time?
And then of course there is the money side of this. A downed coaster generates no revenue, it only turns people away. Know what does an even better job of discouraging riders? Any coaster that hurts or kills people. I'm certain that far less people are willing to ever ride TTD after this, and that hurts park attendance. Also, CP is losing a lot of money fixing and maintaining a ride that constantly breaks. Any modifications that may be attemped to finally fix what ails the Dragster, will (would?) cost money. Cedar Point is not getting its $25 million out of this ride.
But sometimes flaws are inherent in a design, engineered in and can't be reasonably engineered out. Maybe CP and Intamin should just learn from this, tear down TTD, and build something in its place. Something better, that makes us forget Top Thrill Dragster ever even existed.
All flaws can be engineered out. And generally, the cost of re-engineering will cost less than removal of the ride. ie If the problem only exists with something along the cable mechanism, why the heck would you tear out the entire ride to repair that part of things? If there were a structural problem, that would be cause for removal, but there isn't so it won't be.
Why is everyone calling for removing the ride?
I'm out
Goodbye MrScott
John
Shorty said:
I wonder if it hurt anymore than getting hit by the water at the end of the launch track in the front seat.
That got me thinking. Do we know where exactly on the launch the impact occured? I wonder if the spray at the end of the launch propelled some of the cable bits above the track? Also, could the water in the launch have a negative effect on the cable, ie causing it to rust away in bits and pieces? Just more hypotheses.
Scott W. Short
- Proud member of the Out-Of-Town Coaster Weirdos
Did the train actually launch all the way through? Since reading Dave's post, I would have thought that the train launched, then before the train hit the slope some cable, return or launch, snapped. If that was the case, then it probably would have rolled back. (Just like a normal rollback) But if the cable snapped sooner or later, the train might have made it all of the way over or it would have barely gone up the slope, maybe launching at... say 40-50 mph? That would have been the only launch that would have caused some concern to spectators.
This is pretty much a question for anyone who was there.
You must be logged in to post