What time did this happen? My brother (in from Kansas) and I had ridden the front at about 5:30pm after waiting about 4 hours for it on the day of the incident. There was some extensive downtime while waiting in line, but nothing that I thought to be worried about.
I hope everyone involved is okay and that the investigation pending will correct the problem.
~Rob Willi
Scott W. Short
- Proud member of the Out-Of-Town Coaster Weirdos
HeyIsntThatRob? said:
What time did this happen? ~Rob Willi
In one of the other threads,
Just to let you guys know, 7/12 I was at the park and the ride went down around 8:30, and they said they were expecting VERY lengthy delays. Instantly I saw about 6 or 7 people going down towards the engine bay, and later saw them with the crane near the end of the launch. Just figured I'd let you guys know.
This is just after it seemed like they got through the problems that had been plagueing the ride for the last few weeks.
Goodbye MrScott
John
ROUNDABOUND.
Yeah, I would say they really do mean indefinite.
A year and a half of unending problems. Can't run for even a single day without issues. Isn't there some rule on how long you can beat a dead horse? (Po!ntBuzz posters exempt, of course. LOL!)
Hey, I heard a rumor that Top Thrill Dragster is sinking...
The Dragster problem doesn't sound like the launch cable was coming apart and throwing metal, it sounds more like something with the groove the catch car runs in, or maybe the sheeves the cable runs on before the engine building.
Whatever the cause is, it's something that will get fixe and probably inspected more often. It's still a new machine, and they are probably still figuring out the preventative maintenance intervals.
I'd rather be in my boat with a drink on the rocks,
than in the drink with a boat on the rocks.
:(
Let's go straight to the Merry-Go-Round!
But that doesn't make Dragster a lemon. Poorly designed in some respects? Yep. Is there probably some stubbornness on Intamin's side for making design changes that would help increase capacity and correct the existing flaws? I'm guessing so. Has CP done it's darnedest to keep Dragster open for all of us to ride? Yeah, I think so.
Unfortunately, accidents happen with mechanical things, no matter how well or how poorly they are designed. Thankfully, no one was killed or seriously/permanently injured. It should be interesting to see what is determined as the cause of the shards and how they choose to remedy the problem.
It's frustrating to have Dragster down again. But I'm hoping that while it's down, Intamin and CP will finally get around to taking advantage of the down time and look into making other needed changes as well. Maybe, just maybe we could end up with a much better (new or at least improved) Dragster.
But I can't help wondering if we'll ever see any other Intamins at any CF parks after this.
Just my $0.02. And a heartfelt "Hang in there guys!" to the crew.
Laura
needless quotation removed. -J
Well said Laura. This is my first time using the quote botton and I still havent quite figured it out.
I think future Intamins at CP is solely in the hands of Intamin and how they respond(ed) to this and all the other situations. If Intamin demonstrates the same level of customer service that CP does, then I think it is safe to assume there will be more Intamins at CP (MF is a huge hit with the GP and has only had minor issues compared to TTD). Furthermore, Intamin gave CP a much bigger bang for their buck ($25m) than Morgan gave its customer with SD2000 (and I believe that ride is still closed).
I too hope this down time will solve all the other issues with TTD, but we said (hoped) that last year. Time will tell for sure.
Tom *** Edited 7/13/2004 3:58:28 PM UTC by Jeff***
P.S. I hope the injured will not blame CP for there Injuries and delay a new coaster in the near future from being built. In other words I hope they recover 100% and are not greedy.
America's Roller coast
RAP SUCKS! METAL ONLY!
TTD 120 MPH
420 FEET
Pete said:
It's still a new machine, and they are probably still figuring out the preventative maintenance intervals.
Sorry, Pete but I have to disagree with your positive approach to this. Figuring out preventative maintenance *after* incidents happen is unacceptable. When you have a machine that you entrust with the lives and well-being of so many people to you need to make sure it's always running in the safest manner possible. There's no room for error and no room for figuring out stuff on the fly.
Somewhere along the lines, whether it's Intamin, Cedar Point, or the company that made the cable, something went wrong. Inspections, maintenence, planning... something along the line broke down that could have prevented this incident. People were hurt needlessly. Minor injuries, yes, but it could have been much, much worse.
You must be logged in to post