Did anyone else notice that one of CP's newest coasters, Mantis, will not be open for Friday Halloweekends this year? Not a good sign, Mantis fans. This seems to be proof that the ride is lacking a large audience, just like Mean Streak.
*** This post was edited by Ffej 9/9/2003 6:54:34 PM ***
MrScott
------------------
"If we go any faster, she'll blow apart for sure!"
------------------
Arms down.....Arms down.....Arms down.......Arms down.....Arms down....Arms down...(you think they would get it the first time?!)
TTD-9 Rollbacks-1
Mantis is great especially in the front. Watch remindes me back in July 8, 2003 me and my dad were 3nd. and 4th. in line for Mantis witch two Cp empeoyees were standing in front of us. They were off work for now. One was a man he had the whole day off while his wife or girlfriend(I don't remember) had to work at 1 or 2 or 3. We all stood in the front car for the first ride of the day, it was amazing. If one of you are on this site please respont and let me know who you are.
MS I could care less.
Maybe take it down and make a recreation of Sivering Timbers in a compact space.
Sorry for any spelling mistakes
------------------
"Welcome back riders, how was your ride?"
*** This post was edited by twisterII 9/11/2003 10:29:30 PM ***
Its an awesome ride, I love it. Tearing it down would be a shame...
I would only give up for is 2-3 new coasters in its place, and an extension off the midway...
------------------
TTD: 6 (Rollbacks seen: 24)
MF: 20
WT: 9
------------------
CP 2K3: 17
"No for real, the poopsmith is a good guy. He's just got a crappy job..." -homestar runner
------------------
It's not war, famine, or pestilence; it's only downtime.
------------------
Race For The Sky!
There is plenty of room at CP to build without touching MS. If there really was a space problem then yeah tear it down. But until that happens I say leave it be.
I think a better option would be to build a woody on the beach next to WT and DT. Or anywhere on the island.
And besides, MS is simple one of the best looking rides at night, with the exception of maybe MF and Power Tower.
But seriously, MS is not THAT bad and I'd be sad to see it go. Attendance for MS would probably increase if there was some other attraction (be it another coaster or a good flat ride) built close to the Mean Streak.
MS tip: hold onto the headrest with both hands as you enter the brake areas---helps prevent whiplash.
If CP builds another woodie, then I sure hope it's similar in design to the Comet at SF Great Escape. The Comet is not the highest or fastest, but sure is fun!!
------------------
2003 stats: (as of 9/10/03)
Magnum - 1,888
Everything else - 94
------------------
I think one of em was from Arkansas. Get it?
Let's face it. Mean Streak was not intended to be run in this way. Any ride that has strong brakes on a hill needs to be redesigned. The ride needs new smooth track technology. The trains need to become more comfortable/padded. The midcourse and end brakes need to become smooth like MF or TTD. No brakes on the hill or unecessarily strong midcourse brakes. Alter certain elements in the ride to produce more air time. More speed needed through the wooden tunnel part.
Correcting these problems could make the ride mass pleasing. CP could promote the improvements, make it the year's new attraction, and slap on a new name, possibly temporarily, like "The New Mean Streak" ( or "Son of Mean Streak" :) )
I think the same should be done about any ride that has repeated complaints (Mantis?). King's Island improved Flight of Fear drastically. It was a neat ride, but people were hating it because of the painful headbanging on the shoulder restraints. The trains were redesigned and converted to lap bars. It is one of my favorite coasters now, and the increased lines must mean people agree.
Yesh yesh, that'd be nice.
------------------
AKA Cobraroller on Cbuzz
Ffej said:
Think about it...yes, bigger does not seem better for wooden coasters at all, but how marketable is a new 125-foot wood coaster for the general public?
VERY. All CP needs to do is announce they were going to put in a ride very similar to Shivering Timbers and then just watch the people flock back to CP to ride it.
------------------
cyberdman
I think the reaction would be, especially from young adults, "125 feet!?!?! That sux! Wasnt the last one over like 400?? Man, the economy must REALLY be bad."
TTD was a ride created for the masses and the world's attention. Wicked Twister was a great ride, but look at the attention it has gotten? I remember opening day my friend was like "This thing looks so lame; wasn't the last one (MF) way bigger?" Now just think of a 125 foot wooden coaster for the mass public...little excitement will be created. Regardless of the type of roller coaster...wood, inverted, suspended, the general public seems to compare them on the same scale. That's why I believe the wooden roller coaster is becoming extinct.
Personally I think the mystique and arguement about massive height hill coasters only lends itself to steel coasters. I would have to argue that the rest of the "GP", as you put it, would think so too.
------------------
cyberdman
*** This post was edited by cyberdman 9/14/2003 8:40:42 PM ***
I've already stated that the biggest coasters are not necessarily best and that you don't need the highest height for a great wooden coaster (you actually quoted me saying that), so I agree entirely. But, I was strictly talking about how marketable a new 125 ft.wooden coaster would be.
Wooden roller coasters require high maintenance and they give rougher rides. Cedar Point wood have to make an absolute perfect wooden coaster, it could get attention as the best, and then maybe it'd find an audience (but how likely is that?). Still, I don't think the lines for it would ever rival TTD or MF, two coasters that are smooth steel and have the highest heights. Compare the waits for Blue/Mean Streak to Raptor, MF, and TTD; see where the masses are?
So, I still think you're confusing the coaster enthusiast with the casual nature of the general public. The masses are drawn to the largest heights, the most extreme features, and the steel coasters. A smaller wooden coaster defies all of these elements. I don't see CP doing this any time soon; they need an investment that's really going to pay off and increase attendance.
Look at parks all across the world; sadly, wooden coasters are becoming a thing of the past. To draw in the masses, the parks have tried to compromise by providing wooden coasters that have the highest height or first-looping element, etc. But, it's been a failure...I think that means the future will be overwhelmingly steel.
Everyone, feel free to offer your thoughts on this.
You must be logged in to post