CoasterFreak31899 said:
B&M better make this think better and LONGER than X-Flight. I was on it last week and the only element that makes it somewhat worth the wait is the extreme fly-through!
I live in the Chicagoland area, and I can't disagree more. Given the space constraints they had, and also considering it's a wing coaster, so the trains consume a LOT of that space, I think X-Flight is a pretty incredible coaster.
384 MF laps
Smoking Area Drone Pilot
Dvo said:
CoasterFreak31899 said:
B&M better make this think better and LONGER than X-Flight. I was on it last week and the only element that makes it somewhat worth the wait is the extreme fly-through!I live in the Chicagoland area, and I can't disagree more. Given the space constraints they had, and also considering it's a wing coaster, so the trains consume a LOT of that space, I think X-Flight is a pretty incredible coaster.
Yes, I too live in the Chicagoland area, and it's a great "first of its kind ride" but in my opinion, I think they could've made it a little longer. I take back what I said in the other post but I wasn't saying that I didn't enjoy the ride, it was just way too short!
Coaster Boi said:
Yes. Well the year they put MF in, they spent around 40 million. 25 is kinda small. Well, for CP it is. :)
I'm pretty sure Maverick was Cedar Point's largest investment, and that was in the $25 million range. I'm sure theirs a little bit of inflation since MF was built, but no where near enough to "$40 million"
Also X-Flight cost $12-15 million, and Dollywood spent $20 million on Wild Eagle (and that included demolishing/moving several structures and building on a hill.) Taking this into consideration, $25 million (which it could be a few million more as $25 million seems like a rounded down number) seems like a very nice price tag.
rainingmaize said:
I'm pretty sure Maverick was Cedar Point's largest investment, and that was in the $25 million range. I'm sure theirs a little bit of inflation since MF was built, but no where near enough to "$40 million"
Keep in mind that steel had nearly doubled in price between 2000 and 2007. That, combined with inflation (which would put MF's cost at $30 million in 2007 terms), would likely make MF a significantly larger project than Maverick.
Brandon
The construction cam is now live on cedarpoint.com. (http://www.cedarpoint.com/online-fun/webcams) You can already see the demolition in the back.
Imagine that, it's only 930 in the morning.
Favorite Wood: 1. Balder (Liseberg), 2. Boulder Dash (Lake Compounce), 3. Voyage (Holiday World), 4. Phoenix (Knoebels) 5. The Beast (Kings Island)
FavoriteSteel:1.Expedition GeForce (Holiday Park) 2. Rita (Alton Towers) 3.Magnum XL-200 (CP) 4. Nemisis (Alton Towers) 5. X (SFMM)
I dont think theres a limit, went to the park last week and walked all the way behind DT almost right next to it, it were I snapped those pics of the large blue pallets. It looked as if the beach went at least another 300 yards beyond that.
As far as the 25 mllion investment goes...
Isnt that the same amount spent on Maverick?
Maverick also had 2 sets of LIMS, from what I understand are insanely expensive.
Wild eagle cost 20 Million, including some demolitions and an awesome station and some theming.
This coaster will be bigger than Wild Eagle, that much has been said, and it was posted that B&M said it was a "showstopper"
Lets say... Using Wild Eagle as a benchmark, CP uses the money they put into their theming and station, and puts that towards the front gate. Then lets say that CP ad just as much demolitions/construction cost as they did with WE...
Thats an extra 5 million to play with....
Thats also not considering that B&M and CP may have entered a deal similiar to the one CP and Intamin had for multiple coasters/rides over a period of time which may give them a couple million discount
Considering all of these facotrs... This ride may be HUGE
Closed topic.