Water will involved with whatever goes into the former WWL site.
Maybe this track is slated for somewhere else? Like the Demon Drop area?
Something else to chew on...
MrScott
Mayor, Lighthouse Point
Most every post in this thread makes me shake my head. Why can't the most obvious explanation be the one that everyone can accept? That there's an Intamin coaster of some kind being built in Frontier Town?
Jeff - Advocate of Great Great Tunnels™ - Co-Publisher - PointBuzz - CoasterBuzz - Blog - Music
Because some people don't want it to be an Intamin, Jeff. And until its actually built, staring them in the face, they'll think of any reason to call it something else.
Brandon
I know back in 90 that the third hill was re-profiled. However, this was something last year that track was replaced.
djDaemon said:
Because some people don't want it to be an Intamin, Jeff.
I don't want it to be an Intamin, not because I think their rides aren't fun, but because their recent track record leaves a little more than something to be desired. However, with all the recent evidence (like the track that this thread discusses) no matter how much I don't want one doesn't hide the fact that I'm pretty sure now that we are getting one.
*** Edited 5/11/2006 4:51:53 PM UTC by JuggaLotus***
Goodbye MrScott
John
Without trying to sound like an ass, why should we believe anything you or Walt say Jeff?
I'm not doubting that there is an Intamin coaster being put in the park and I'm 99% sure it will be in Frontier Town, nor am I doubting you and Walt know.
But that is no reason to hang onto every word you two say. Why should I believe you two are not throwing us in another direction?
I haven't said or teased anything.
What did either one of us say that wasn't already blatantly obvious?
Jeff - Advocate of Great Great Tunnels™ - Co-Publisher - PointBuzz - CoasterBuzz - Blog - Music
Enthusiasts will be disappointed... or not.
We will all be happy... or not.
:)
Edited for added happiness.
*** Edited 5/11/2006 4:53:24 PM UTC by djDaemon***
Brandon
I dont feel like digging up quotes but here is an example.
Note: not verbatim, being lazy.
"enthusiasts will not be pleased"
"it's not a setpoint coaster"
For the record, i'm not trying to argue for the sake of arguing.
I just thinks it's a conspiracy theory (jeff you can quote me that I think this could be a conspiracy theory now :) )
geewhzz said:
djDaemon said:
Guys, c'mon. Does it look like a flyer?Think outside the box.
Ahh...
So, its a prototype upside-down flyer? Which would make it a coaster that you lay on your back... That sounds like fun. *rolls eyes*
Brandon
Give me a break. By saying enthusiasts will complain, I'm giving an opinion. And it's most obviously NOT a Setpoint ride. Anyone who can look at the pictures can tell you that.
Jeff - Advocate of Great Great Tunnels™ - Co-Publisher - PointBuzz - CoasterBuzz - Blog - Music
well I always believe someone until they give me a reason not to, and walt and jeff have always been truthful to us, so i'll go on believing them
I agree that enthusiasts will complain...there will always be complaints no matter what. So, that was a general statement again to just stir the pot.
About it NOT being a Setpoint ride was stated before there was obvious proof of Intamin track near BE. So, you can't use the pictures to explain that one.
You must be logged in to post