I'm sure that's exactly how they plan out their cap ex.
Jeff - Advocate of Great Great Tunnels™ - Co-Publisher - PointBuzz - CoasterBuzz - Blog - Music
They will get something in 2009.... it just might not be a coaster. Anyone expecting a coaster can just live with it. I mean look at maXair... we got that and that ride rocks and its not a coaster. Then they put in Skyhawk, which IMO was a bad choice to put in another swinging flat ride the year after another one but, CP can improve with out coasters.
You're taking what Kinzel said in the wrong way. What he means is Maverick was a $21 million investment. The company must hold out until a similar investment for at least a year or two. Basically saying CP can't afford such an investment every year.
Nothing actually noted 2009 will be a new coaster, it just says that don't expect anything big the year after such a large project.
When running a business such as CP, the park must offer something new and exciting every few years make people come. Adding nothing for a couple years does no good. Roller coasters aren't always the answer, nor does always have to be a ride. Improvements to lacking areas are always welcome which is why talk about the kiddy areas isn't out of range of possibilities. A 500 foot coaster is though.
Some of you guys have get your mind outside of the world of RCT where you can just put in a coaster anywhere at anytime, and start thinking logically in the real world. There are a lot of factors that must be thought about when adding new rides. This might be obvious, but I sometimes feel it isn't on here.
-Craig-
2008:Magnum XL-200 | Top Thrill Dragster
2007:Corkscrew | Magnum XL-200 | Maverick
StealthPirate07 said:
I mean look at maXair... we got that and that ride rocks and its not a coaster. Then they put in Skyhawk, which IMO was a bad choice to put in another swinging flat ride the year after another one but, CP can improve with out coasters.
I have to disagree...
Although maXair is a super fun ride, I can't ride it unless I want to sit on a bench for 3 hours after riding it trying not to puke, but Skyhawk is super fun as well... and I can ride that thing all day long.
So to someone who can ride both of them, it may seem like a bad choice, but for someone like myself... I'm pretty excited that there is another big swinging flat ride that I can enjoy too!
Season Pass Holder Since 1998!
Brian Raymond on Coaster Buzz
Ride On Mr. Scott!
I didn't ride MaXair until this year, but it certainly seemed to swing well. That ride seemed to go on forever. Of course it might have been party because I was feeling bad for my wife who I convinced to go on the ride thinking that it didn't look like I spun around all that fast. She agreed with me and got off the ride feeling sick. At least it didn't last quite three hours for her. For me, the ride did seem a lot more disorienting than I thought it would.
Sky Hawk definately gives a different ride experience. The lap bars make it scarier and the swinging without spinning lets you concentrate on the swinging part a lot more. I just wish that the ride length was as long as MaXair's.
...and enjoy the rest of your day at Cedar Point, The Am-aaaa-zement park!
You must be logged in to post