It would be nice if they could come up with some definite measurements (hip/thigh/waist and height) that would allow guests of the park to determine ahead of time whether or not they will be able to ride. So many factors can come into play, though, including the aforementioned "shrinkage" of the seat belts, differences in how people measure themselves, etc. And the empathy of the ride attendants, which I was lucky enough to encounter. Not to mention that every potential guest would have to have the ability and foresight to check the website ahead of time.
My point is, there is NO one word, phrase, or form-letter that is guaranteed not to offend. I agree that the situation stinks, but what is the fair solution? Thus far, I have not seen anything that will make everyone happy, besides adjusting the restraints to a one-size-fits-anyone (even the so-called morbidly obese) size. And is that realistic? Not being a physics major, I can't say for absolute certainty whether the changes to the restraint requirements are necessary, but what do the ride manufacturer and CP have to gain by pissing people off? I have to believe there is a reason that they are doing this..and the reason is safety. Not discrimination. Just because I fit with no problems last year and did not fall out of the ride, does not mean that I was completely safe in riding the coaster in my current state of being (which is, admittedly, overweight).
Alesha
---------
The number of people who assume it is their right to go through life without ever being offended never ceases to amaze me.
MrScott
Mayor, Lighthouse Point
You must be logged in to post