Avljkb22:
I was only able to find those pivoting brake fins on three other coasters, Nefeskesen, Red Fire, and iSpeed.
I thought Cheetah Hunt also used them on the first set of brakes heading into the final brake run. The ones that are on the tiny hill up into the brakes, then they switch to standard vertical-movement brakes once the track flattens out. Having trouble finding photographic proof to back this up, or prove that I'm remembering wrong.
EDIT: After looking closer at a 4K POV, I think I'm wrong and they're standard.
2003 - Wicked Twister
2004 - Wicked Twister/Top Thrill Dragster
I posted this video some pages back, but it's hard to watch this and not think of it as a possibility. I don't think different companies working on different aspects of the ride is out of the question either. As far as I know the lightning train is the only thing like it on the market. Considering Cedar Fair's recent love affair with Zamperla, not to mention Wild Mouse, I'm sure it at least came up in the conversation.
Promoter of fog.
Yes. Cheetah hunt does have them in at least one location. There’s 2 or 3 clear pictures of them on RCDB. They are deployed in those photos though, you can see the pneumatic cylinder underneath and you can also tell which side they’re hinged on. Sorry, that post was my response to a comment about cheetah hunt also having them. I should’ve quoted the original.
DA20Pilot:
I'm starting to think that Intamin doing the track and LSM system and Zamperla providing the trains is a very plausible scenario.
With the reworked track arriving with what appears to be modern Intamin hardware, some scenario like this seems increasingly plausible.
I wonder if Intamin might be providing the track (& LSM by way of Indrivetec) hardware, and Zamperla is providing the trains and delivering the final product. Given the circumstances - poor deliverables' performance to and relationship with CF, and that it's an existing Intamin structure - it wouldn't be crazy that CF would want Intamin involved to some extent, but also wouldn't necessarily be keen on Intamin being responsible for the complete project. And Zamperla, given their eagerness to grow and tackle larger projects, might be willing to take on the task of taking Intamin hardware and delivering a final product to CF.
On the other hand, such a partnership could be kind of tricky, so maybe it as simple as Intamin doing the bulk of the work and using Zamperla trains. But if that's the case, I'm not particularly optimistic about this thing opening on time and having a smooth first season.
Only about 100 hours until we find out.
Brandon
Can someone explain where the idea behind an Intamin/Zamperla partnership on this project? Seems like several people think Intamin is doing basically the whole project with Zamperla providing trains. There's a few issues with that, one issue being that Intamin also makes fantastic trains with great restraints that are already proven. I don't see these companies working together.
With any major attraction, there are always dozens of manufacturers, contractors, suppliers, etc., involved. It's not as if Intamin is providing Intamin-manufactured PLCs, sensors, AC motors, VFDs, cables, fittings, etc. Or even their own LSM tech, which comes from Indrivetec. And RMC doesn't provide controls systems, that comes from IOE. And so on.
So in a scenario where Intamin and Zamperla are both involved, it stands to reason that one of major players involved will be the entity responsible for the final product.
Brandon
Closed topic. Archived.