After being at the site today, I think my crappy photoshop concept is not very far off at all....
http://putfile.com/pic.php?pic=7/18800285632.jpg&s=f10
They are smoothing out the sides of the giant pit and getting ready for water...
http://putfile.com/pic.php?pic=main/7/19401255351.jpg&s=f10
Mr. Scott was right water is involved now we just have to figure out how much water if any ends up on the riders... ;) *** Edited 7/14/2006 5:26:37 AM UTC by Aaron_toledo***
I didn't put Iron Dragon because it actually mists the trains with water. I'd actually agree that water is INVOLVED with that ride.
I may have a different concept of "involved", but I think it has to engage and/or interact with the part of the ride that moves. Sheikra, for example, has water that is "involved" with the ride.
Mostly, I just like giving Mr Scott a hard time though because he brings up the water so much. :)
I think you misunderstoof my post, Coastern3rd. I was stating that I don't believe a coaster going OVER water constitutes water being INVOLVED with the ride. That's why I didn't include Iron Dragon in my list. Water is actually misted onto that ride, so I would agree that water is involved with Iron Dragon. I don't believe water is involved with any of CPs other coasters.
halltd said:
A coaster going OVER water does not constitute water "being involved" with the ride, Mr Scott. If that was the case, water would be involved with Millennium, Mantis and Mine Ride too.
Don't forget Disaster Transport. That flight to Alaska has to go over water somewhere. ;)
My author website: mgrantroberts.com.
Why? You can go around the great lakes, do a little slalom through Minnesota and then not sure about Canada, but I think you could get there without going over water. Just might be a really long flight.
Edit - change across to around.
*** Edited 7/14/2006 4:34:43 PM UTC by JuggaLotus***
Goodbye MrScott
John
In my personal opinion (not that it's worth much), I think that any coaster that "passes" over water would "involve" water.
If you were to take away the water that's there the ride would lose something. Therefore it involves the water.
Now, whether or not the ride interacts with the water is another story in itself, but i'm leaning towards MrScott's opinion on it.
eat. sleep. ride! - Coaster apparel and accessories!
Ride on, MrScott!
JuggaLotus said:
Why? You can go around the great lakes, do a little slalom through Minnesota and then not sure about Canada, but I think you could get there without going over water. Just might be a really long flight.
You're telling me you could fly from Sandusky to Alaska without crossing one river, one lousy lake or puddle? You're quite a navigator! :) I never said a large body of water.
Man, am I good at getting off topic. Is there some kind of award for this skill?
My author website: mgrantroberts.com.
You must be logged in to post