Photoshops / Mock-ups

Aaron_toledo

Friday, July 14, 2006 5:24 AM

After being at the site today, I think my crappy photoshop concept is not very far off at all....

http://putfile.com/pic.php?pic=7/18800285632.jpg&s=f10

They are smoothing out the sides of the giant pit and getting ready for water...

http://putfile.com/pic.php?pic=main/7/19401255351.jpg&s=f10

Mr. Scott was right water is involved now we just have to figure out how much water if any ends up on the riders... ;) *** Edited 7/14/2006 5:26:37 AM UTC by Aaron_toledo***

+0

MrScott

Friday, July 14, 2006 8:10 AM

Did somebody say water?

MrScott


Mayor, Lighthouse Point

+0

djDaemon

Friday, July 14, 2006 12:18 PM
djDaemon's avatar

Don't encourage him, Aaron. ;)

I think somebody was trying to explain that those footers' varying heights indicated there would be water around them. I wonder who that was?

*pats self on back*


Brandon

+0

halltd

Friday, July 14, 2006 12:59 PM

A coaster going OVER water does not constitute water "being involved" with the ride, Mr Scott. If that was the case, water would be involved with Millennium, Mantis and Mine Ride too.

+0

Coastern3rd

Friday, July 14, 2006 1:40 PM

and Iron Dragon

+0

JuggaLotus

Friday, July 14, 2006 1:55 PM
JuggaLotus's avatar

And who says its not involved in those rides? I've certainly never argued that.


Goodbye MrScott

John

+0

halltd

Friday, July 14, 2006 2:17 PM

I didn't put Iron Dragon because it actually mists the trains with water. I'd actually agree that water is INVOLVED with that ride.

I may have a different concept of "involved", but I think it has to engage and/or interact with the part of the ride that moves. Sheikra, for example, has water that is "involved" with the ride.

Mostly, I just like giving Mr Scott a hard time though because he brings up the water so much. :)

+0

JuggaLotus

Friday, July 14, 2006 2:18 PM
JuggaLotus's avatar

But Millennium has misting fans in line that get people wet. So therefore water is involved on that ride too. ;)


Goodbye MrScott

John

+0

Coastern3rd

Friday, July 14, 2006 2:26 PM

No no, I was adding to your list of rides that go over water.

But wait, so now water cannot be involved if it is misted? It has to be sprayed or shot?

What if it showered on you? Or sprinkled?

*** Edited 7/14/2006 2:27:39 PM UTC by Coastern3rd***

+0

JuggaLotus

Friday, July 14, 2006 2:33 PM
JuggaLotus's avatar

My last trip everything was a water ride. And it hurt too.


Goodbye MrScott

John

+0

halltd

Friday, July 14, 2006 2:36 PM

I think you misunderstoof my post, Coastern3rd. I was stating that I don't believe a coaster going OVER water constitutes water being INVOLVED with the ride. That's why I didn't include Iron Dragon in my list. Water is actually misted onto that ride, so I would agree that water is involved with Iron Dragon. I don't believe water is involved with any of CPs other coasters.

+0

MrScott

Friday, July 14, 2006 2:48 PM

I still believe water will be involved with this ride. And I mean more than just passing over it.

MrScott


Mayor, Lighthouse Point

+0

JuggaLotus

Friday, July 14, 2006 2:48 PM
JuggaLotus's avatar

Just because you don't believe it, doesn't make it any less true.


Goodbye MrScott

John

+0

Ensign Smith

Friday, July 14, 2006 3:45 PM

halltd said:
A coaster going OVER water does not constitute water "being involved" with the ride, Mr Scott. If that was the case, water would be involved with Millennium, Mantis and Mine Ride too.

Don't forget Disaster Transport. That flight to Alaska has to go over water somewhere. ;)


My author website: mgrantroberts.com.

+0

milleniumforcerocks

Friday, July 14, 2006 3:52 PM

^good one!

+0

JuggaLotus

Friday, July 14, 2006 3:53 PM
JuggaLotus's avatar

Why? You can go around the great lakes, do a little slalom through Minnesota and then not sure about Canada, but I think you could get there without going over water. Just might be a really long flight.

Edit - change across to around.
*** Edited 7/14/2006 4:34:43 PM UTC by JuggaLotus***


Goodbye MrScott

John

+0

Loopy

Friday, July 14, 2006 4:33 PM
Loopy's avatar

In my personal opinion (not that it's worth much), I think that any coaster that "passes" over water would "involve" water.

If you were to take away the water that's there the ride would lose something. Therefore it involves the water.

Now, whether or not the ride interacts with the water is another story in itself, but i'm leaning towards MrScott's opinion on it.


eat. sleep. ride! - Coaster apparel and accessories!

Ride on, MrScott!

+0

Ensign Smith

Friday, July 14, 2006 5:05 PM

JuggaLotus said:
Why? You can go around the great lakes, do a little slalom through Minnesota and then not sure about Canada, but I think you could get there without going over water. Just might be a really long flight.

You're telling me you could fly from Sandusky to Alaska without crossing one river, one lousy lake or puddle? You're quite a navigator! :) I never said a large body of water.

Man, am I good at getting off topic. Is there some kind of award for this skill?


My author website: mgrantroberts.com.

+0

JuggaLotus

Friday, July 14, 2006 5:09 PM
JuggaLotus's avatar

It might take some work (puddles don't count, but ponds do) but it could (maybe) be done. I'd need some pretty detailed maps though. And it could take a while.


Goodbye MrScott

John

+0

redsox5

Friday, July 14, 2006 5:10 PM

^^I'm sure there is but, you probably don't want to receive it.


New Season of 'The Office'. TONIGHT!!!

+0

You must be logged in to post

POP Forums app ©2025, POP World Media, LLC - Terms of Service