For a 500 foot coaster there doesn't have to be a standard lift or launch. It would easy to have a vertical lift elevator style. Vekoma already has the thrill lift:
http://www.vekoma.com/rides_thrill_mega/thrill_lift/3d_side_b.gif
I think there are lot more options besides flyer, floorless, dive machine.
Race For The Sky!
MichiganRollerCoast said:
Grovite18 said:
Something I have never seen is a half-loop, complete barrel roll (inline twist) and an exit of another half-loop. Kind of like a cobra roll, except you would continue in the direction you entered the inversion afterwards, and it is more linear instead of "broken" with half corkscrews.Anyone see what I'm trying to say? lol.
That element is actually on the SLC. So Thunderhawk at GL has one.
Nonono. Thunderhawk has a complete corkscrew in the middle, making it looks almost like a heart. This would be a complete inline twist and it would be completely linear. Looking at it from the front or back, it would just look like a straight line.
You would enter going this way: ---->
and exit going this way: ----->
Half loop, complete inline twist, exit with a half loop going the same direction.
*edit*
Here, I did a rough idea on RCT just to illustrate it.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v455/MForce2k/t13.jpg *** Edited 3/17/2006 3:48:36 AM UTC by Grovite18***
Kevinj said:
Besides, its hard to build a 500 foot dive machine.
Why would a Dive Machine be harder to build than another coaster. Building a 500' anything is hard.
Grovite18: that does not exit in the same direction that you enter...
*** Edited 3/17/2006 11:16:18 AM UTC by Jason Hammond***
884 Coasters, 35 States, 7 Countries
http://www.rollercoasterfreak.com My YouTube
He is saying the direction of travel would be the same. It would not turn you around and send you back like a cobra roll would do.
JH - sorry, i was just being sarcastic because of my recent rants on why i think it may be a vertical coaster on the way. :)
Grr. I hate how you cant make Millenium Force on RCT3. Sorry...venting....
Westside7th said:
For a 500 foot coaster there doesn't have to be a standard lift or launch. It would easy to have a vertical lift elevator style. Vekoma already has the thrill lift:
http://www.vekoma.com/rides_thrill_mega/thrill_lift/3d_side_b.gif
I think there are lot more options besides flyer, floorless, dive machine.
To much weight can lead to many probs. I would never trust that if my life was on the line. Not that it wouldn't be a cool ride but 500 ft?? I see MAYBE 200 ft but 500 ft would be to much stress on the lift it self.
I saw an animation of that lift hill at Eastcoaster. After you get vertical, you hang there for a few seconds. It looks pretty cool.
884 Coasters, 35 States, 7 Countries
http://www.rollercoasterfreak.com My YouTube
The verticle lift is VERY cool, but not really proven imo. I can't believe CP would build it, because problems would be difficult to solve for if people were in the train (unless they brought it back down).
I think capacity and reliability will be the drivers of Maverick.
Now that Intamin has designed the cable lift to be activated away from the station (SFGA new woodie), that is my best quess for Maverick.
There are no "minor" malfunctions at 500 feet in the air. The amount of stress that would be on that lift, from just looking at it, I would be VERY uncomfortable riding it, and I consider myself as "die-hard" of a coaster rider as anyone else here. I just don't see a safe implementation of that ride. Having people stranded on it? Having ONE part work improperly in the rotation of that platform? Yikes!
It looks like a thrilling concept and I've heard good things about the one that has been built (Taiwan?), but I cannot see that design going several hundreds of feet up. It's just too... too impractical of a way to move a train up. The capacity would suffer and I'm sure we'd run into a problem similar to TTD where you're trying to put moving parts under a lot of almost constant stress.
Grovite18 said:
This would be a complete inline twist and it would be completely linear. Looking at it from the front or back, it would just look like a straight line.You would enter going this way: ---->
and exit going this way: ----->Half loop, complete inline twist, exit with a half loop going the same direction.
You mean like this: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v175/Dragster420/Picture021.jpg
-Adam G- The OG Dragster nut
Here's a hint for the 2007 addition...It's not a dive machine!
carry on...
-Gannon
-B.S. Civil Engineering, Purdue University
That Inversion would look still look diffrent because you forgot the effects of Heartlining...
My mind keeps swinging towards a 4D coaster becoming more and more of a possibility...
My FotoSite
Taking a more Academic path..
http://www.nolimitsdevcenter.net/u428
So, if this turns out to be the rumored 500ft. coaster, how many people will go on and on about how it only beats the current record by a mere 44ft.? I really hope that it turns out to be another 4th Dimension coaster, providing the bugs have been worked out and all.
CP_bound said:
Here's a hint for the 2007 addition...It's not a dive machine!carry on...
Now if you can "hint" that it's *not* a flyer, I'll be happy... :)
2007: Millennium Force, 2008: Millennium Force ATL, 2009: Top Thrill Dragster
www.pointpixels.com | www.parkpixels.com
Why doesnt somebody just drive down there and look and take pictures to see if theres anything else going on.
My guess is that the new roller coaster ( if there is one) is going to start by WWL station. Lift hill starts going up poiting by MF lift. Drop and does a bunch of crap where WWL used to be.
Just a guess. *** Edited 3/20/2006 2:23:48 PM UTC by RKilbane04***
Closed topic.