Disappointment

I've never eaten cake, but I know pie is much better, because I really like pie. They both have a lot of sugar, so they're pretty close, but pie is better.
Ok, perhaps I stated it wrong. If many of the kids in here one $1 million dollars they would whine and moan because they didn't win $10 million. In essence, they wouldn't appreciate an impressive $1 million.

Call me old-fashioned, I just can't believe, for the life of me, why people would complain about a ride that will go 100+ miles per hour and over 400 feet. 100 MILES PER HOUR AND OVER 400 FEET TALL!!!

If I want to go upside down a lot I will ride Raptor or Mantis. If I want a long fast ride I will ride Maggie or MF. If I want to go high and fast, I will ride this new ride. I don't think it is quantity, or even quality, that is the driving point of CP's success in the coaster world. I think it is VARIETY.

Would someone please tell me where else in the world you can ride a coaster over 400 feet and over 100 mph? Anyone? Buehler....Buehler....Buehler.
*** This post was edited by Chief Wahoo 11/1/2002 3:15:01 PM ***


CoasterBob said:
I will be disappointed with CP IF this ride turns out to only be L-TH-B. Mainly, it's because I have always thought of CP as a park that "goes one better" than than the current "best" in a particular ride. This happened when Raptor was built higher, faster and with more inversions than Batman. It happened when WT was built higher and with twists on both ends. It also happened when Gemini, Magnum and MF all debuted as the "tallest, steepest, fastest" coasters for their time.

In keeping with that tradition, I just don't see how a simple L-TH-B ride will extend the envelope. Granted, it is certainly looking like it will probably be the tallest and fastest launching circuit coaster when it opens (although I still doubt that it will exceed 400'). But it just seems like such a waste to put all that potential energy into the train only to have it screech to a halt after coming down the hill.

{SNIP}

Oh, and I am STILL looking for a reference to a true L-TH-B coaster that currently exists in the world. I don't think that there is one and this, to me, is further proof that CP isn't building one since they generally do not build a "first of its kind" type of ride.


I dont know in what world "highest tallest fastest" would NOT be seen as "one better". Say what you will, the stats will be impressive.

Okay, just to clear it up for you people, *no* potential energy will be wasted. All the potential energy will be used to launch the train. Once the train is moving, the potential energy will be transformed into kinetic energy. It is this kinetic energy that will be "wasted" (though I'm not really sure where it "goes"..if they were friction brakes, it'd turn into heat, but with mags....hmmm). Sorry, my "inner engineer" was disturbed by that. :)

And the thought of a L-TH-B coaster is not a "new concept" as you claim. I contend that it is simply a different layout of a proven rocket coaster. But assuming en arguendo that by changing this layout into L-TH-B it is "new" then one could contend that the "Oblique loop" on mantis was "new". I dont think *that* was done before.

And anyone who doesnt expect good things from SF is an asshat, plain and simple ;)

lata, jeremy

I have been to SFMM i have to say i think it truly sucked compared to CP I get a season pass to cp every year i have the greatest time of my life SFMM is not anywhere near the same level as CP first of all SFMM wont have 16 coasters they will have 14 because S:TE is a drop like the demon drop if they count S:TE as coaster we will count demon drop as a coaster too putting them at 15 and us at 16 then SFMM has flashback which never ever runs anymore since they put it back at SFMM so that doesnt count so SFMM now has 14 coaster then with the new rides bein built SFMM has 15 CP 17 counting S:TE and demon drop and agree with that CP needs quality not quanity
oh yea i also like pie better than cake
Oh yeah, I *knew* it was one other thing that I wanted to say. That "Quality over Quanity" arguement is bull**** plain and simple. It's something I *never* heard from CP fans until MM announced X, Deja Vu and Goliath Jr.. I dont think that folks with this new-found mantra really believe it at all. Otherwise, everyone would think BGW is the best of all (they truely *do* have quality over quanity).

BTW: You *are* aware that SFMM has a 1st gen freefall as well. So anyway you count it STILL TIED!

lata, jeremy

--who notes that people *have* ridden Flashback @ MM

yea but nobody ever does anymore its like its gonna be demolished but it hasnt been yet and they are counting as a roller coaster itsnot running it hasnt in a long time it dont count
Gemini's avatar
What?

------------------
Virtual Midway
http://www.virtualmidway.com

Gemi I 2nd that

what ?

i meant that nobody rides flashback any more its never running it hasnt in like 3 years it shouldnt count in the coaster count


EXMS Rules Scumrise Sux

CP 16

SFMM 15

SFMM SuuuuuuuuXXXXXXXX

Gemini's avatar
1. Spelling & Grammar usage:
There's a difference between a typo (which we all make) and chat shorthand ("r ne of u lamerz?") People like to read real, spelled out words, with capitalization and punctuation. THERE IS NO NEED TO SHOUT, we can hear you just fine. Please utilize your shift and caps lock key properly. Respect for the English language is important, and that means chat shorthand is not welcome.

I think it would help a lot of people here to read the rules.

------------------
Virtual Midway
http://www.virtualmidway.com

Ok sorry I wasn't really paying attention.


EXMS Rules Scumrise Sux
I for one won't be disappointed by the new layout of the ride. I'll accept whatever CP is going to give us. I now know what Jeff meant by the enthusiasts being "disappointed" by the new ride. My personal disappointment is in the height area. By the way, 70 days since track arrived and still no Millenium Island footers!!! Being at CP today, the new color scheme of Wildcat (neon purple/yellow) looked weird but the new green/purple/orange theming of the other existing ride leaves me wondering what was CP thinkin? Oh well....

"Those who have to criticize others, usually have something lacking in themselves"....Unknown

2hostyl - My "outer engineer" has to speak up. When I referred to wasting a lot of potential energy, I was speaking of putting a train on top of a TBD foot high top hat. From there, that potential energy is "wasted" by simply going through a long pull out (yes, I know, converting it into kenetic energy) and then putting on the brakes.

CP is spending most of their money on potential energy. First the money is going into a hydraulic launching system which takes the potential energy of liquid under pressure and expends it to put the initial kenetic energy into the train. Second, they are building a huge tower which provides a place for the train to go where it will then hold a lot of potential energy.

This is just a thought what sf bought cp and is keeping it secret and building this ride to keep us guessing. That would be why they repainted the Wildcat and they are going to disappoint us greatly when they make this annoucement.

MF 10

Steel Dragon 2000 0


CP King said:
This is just a thought what sf bought cp and is keeping it secret and building this ride to keep us guessing. That would be why they repainted the Wildcat and they are going to disappoint us greatly when they make this annoucement.

Not to dignify with with a response, but...

SF would be in violation of several federal regulations. Since its a publicly traded company, it can't acquire new assets 'secretly'--they have to state publicly when the buy something.

Secondly, CP would never, never, be sold to SF. ThCF does better financially then SF, so why would they sell thier marquee park. Which leads me to...

Third, SF's stock is in the crapper right now, and they're in debt, I beleive. What, exactly, would SF use to buy CP with? Lemon chills?

Finally, CF's philosophy is so diametrically opposed to SF's philosophy that I don't think they'd ever allow CP to be sold to SF, even if they here hemorraging money.

And what does Wildcat's new paint scheme have to do with anything? You've got it backwards--its SF that doesn't paint their coasters, not CF.

I do not think Cedar Point would ever sacrifice quality even going for qty. All other parks around have powered launch ride. CP never had one till Wicked Twister. I know we all are not used to CP introducing coasters at this size, but there is a market out there for them as well. Sure the big ones are more fun, but the short ones are as well.

One reason the lines are shorter and the sorter rides, the lines move quicker. I still wait in line to ride Demon Drop. All coasters and all thrill rides at CP have a different thrill and they are all still exciting. Last time at CP, I went on Gemini probably 3 times in a row. However, it would be interesting if CP done something to make Gemini more exciting. Turn one of the trains backwards. Yes I will still like Mellenium Force and Raptor better than a short coaster, but I would probably still ride it more than once or even more than twice, as long as it is not rough.

mk468zz I know that would never happen. I was being really sarcastic.
A short coaster also has it's advantages, including higher capacity (reality so) and allows for some unique elements in the coaster that would otherwise be pointless on longer ones or on other ones (would you like a 90 degree spinning drop on MF?)

------------------
Love,
The Mole

Yes, on MF that would be awsome.

You must be logged in to post

POP Forums app ©2024, POP World Media, LLC - Terms of Service