Will CP build future coasters that break records such as height, speed, etc.? Somehow most definitely. But will we ever board another new roller coaster that has a huge lift hill, covers a massive amount of area, and offers a lengthy 2.5 or even 3-minute ride time? What do you think?
Keep in mind what I'm trying to convey. Rides like Mantis and Raptor have pretty long ride times, but they are comparatively compact (vs. Magnum). Top Thrill Dragster and Wicked Twister are record-breaking in terms of height, but they are short and also somewhat compact.
There are definitely areas of land left that could accommodate compact roller coasters. There are also some larger sites (Remove Antique Cars in Frontier Town, narrow walkways; or expand into Camper Village); but, using those larger sites would be invasive (especially to the historic Frontier Town). I can only imagine how CP must be battling between conserving the park and adding new thrill rides. Regardless, I'm doubtful we'll ever see another large-scale coaster.
Take it for what it is worth.
------------------
No matter where you go, there you are.
TTD-9 Rollbacks-1
------------------
Guess what? I got a fever! And the only prescription... is more cowbell!
------------------
The best part of riding an arrow is getting off!:)
------------------
http://said.uc.edu/students/oakleysd/cp/CP.jpg
Now tell me Cedar Point is running out of space.
------------------
--Seth
This post is not about going higher, as I clearly stated that Cedar Point would definitely do that. I never doubted CP would surpass Magnum, MF, and someday TTD; it's just a matter of time and developing technology.
And again, the Magnum taking up small amount of real estate was not what I wanted to talk about. Do me a favor...open up the CP park map on the website. Look at Magnum, Meanstreak, MF...compare those to Wild Cat, Wicked Twister, Dragster, Mantis, and Raptor. I think you'll notice they are three stand-outs in terms of sheer size (and the lengths they cover).
What I'm trying to say is that, for me, part of the appeal for Magnum, MF, and Mean Streak is that you actually go somewhere and return to that same initial location. Think about Magnum for a moment...let's say it had to be contained in a rectangular area the size of Gemini. It went up and down in this rectangle, weaving through supports. Would it have the same appeal as the journey along the coast of Lake Erie? I don't think so, IMO. So will we ever acquire another roller coaster like Magnum, Mean Streak, or MF? Or will the future bring launch coasters to conserve space, flying coasters that are mangled into a small plot of land like Mantis, etc...
The aerial picture is nice to look at, but as I stated, that's all invasive space (which is why CP hasn't invaded it yet). CP has always left that area pure, natual, and scenic. There is no denying there is a space problem and there will be moreso in the future, but I only want to talk about space if it relates to another large-scale coaster.
If anyone understands what I'm talking about, I'd love to hear your thoughts. If you don't understand what I'm trying to pinpoint, ignore the topic altogether.
Dodonpa goes somewhere even though it is a launched coaster. It looks like the new Hershey Park coaster will too.
The question is, is there space at Cedar Point to build a big out and back? Presumably they could put a station in the confines of the park and run a coaster out into the parking lot. However, if I want to ride a coaster in a parking lot I will go to a Six Flags park.
You could do another Magnum style coaster but you would infringe on the campground.
The other option is to go up and put coasters over existing rides like they did with Jaguar out at Knott's. What I am getting at is that the possibilities exist.
------------------
No matter where you go, there you are.
I agree that possibilites do exist, but I wonder what trade-offs CP will make to accommodate another large out-n-back, if they choose to have another.
As for lift hills, like you said, it'd probably be a launched out-and-back to conserve space. I would truly miss another 400+ lift hill, as I think the anticipation would be awesome. But realistically, that'd take a great amount of space, create more costs, and it could be dangerous.
I do not believe however that we will see another large wooden coaster such as Mean Streak, wood coaster do take up huige amounts of land, and i just dont see another fitting in at CP.
------------------
-Chris Woodard
"We got pop and Gatorade over here for $100 a bottle, so have your credit card ready. Seriously, the food here is so expensive, I just eat the condiments because I can't afford a meal." - MF que DJ 6/16/03
In looking at Fury's photo, it seems there are plenty of open areas without having to resort to the parking lot. The area next to WT that used to be the aquarium and currently houses Oceania should go. That's an ideal spot for a compact steel coaster (not your point, I understand, just my editorial on Oceana). Plenty of areas near MS, near Gemini and Mine Ride, Millenium Island, the Millenium shoreline, doing a garage for hotel parking, etc.
I don't want this to turn into another "where should a ride go" discussion, but my point is that I believe there is space for a large scale coaster.
------------------
D/\MN GINA!!!!!!!!
MrScott
------------------
"If we go any faster, she'll blow apart for sure!"
The only reason I would think an out and back design would be used is if they went for a height record again.
MF is also and out and back coaster.
------------------
http://said.uc.edu/students/oakleysd/cp/CP.jpg
Now tell me Cedar Point is running out of space.
CP has TONS of room for an out&back or whatever they want to build. If you look at WT you will see tons of open land. CP has tons of beach from WT to the end of the parking lot! They also have the edge of the parking lot on the other side of the park by Blue Streak. I personally would like to see a flyer next to WT and it could swoop down over the water.
------------------
Race For The Sky!
You must be logged in to post