Shawn Meyer said:
Does anyone know if they are going to put a roof up for the entrance?
What makes you think they wont? :)
As far as the gap in the tower goes, I think it's fine. If it is indeed suppose to be that way and not filled, then they did it for a reason.
Also, check out these renderings of the entrance! And holy crap am I LOVING the new look!
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v175/Dragster420/awesome_zps8a08c97e.png
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v175/Dragster420/wow_zps04f48e09.png
Here's the video those renderings are from. Another awesome behind the scenes look.
-Adam G- The OG Dragster nut
Here's my *mean* statement of the day...
If the gate is going to look that good (as shown in the renderings), before you get into the park..
Won't just inside the park look run-down a bit. (Immediate impression)
Ocean motion looks good, but old buildings to the left and right, old sky ride.
Just a weird thought... Hope the inside get spruced up a bit too.
GATEKEEPER-I came, I rode, I was mildly disappointed; until a second ride (rear left) put GateKeeper back on the...it's a nice ride list.
the new front gate looks amazing. My first thought was the magic kingdom entrance. How and where the ticket buildings are and how they funnel you toward the center really remind me of that style of entrance.
In other words, i love it!
I think that the gap is growing on me too. I think once we see everything finished the gap will seamlessly blend into the rest of the architecture.
I really hope that they stay true to the amount of trees there are in the renderings. Standing right by that new cedar point sing is really going to be an interesting experience.
And PB-reader. Word up. i think they do intend on giving certain parts of the entrance a reboot.
I don't think the bolts would necessarily need to be inspected regularly. I guess it depends on how it would be classified. If they're considered supports for the ride then probable but if they're just normal structural bolts that might connect members of a building then they probably wouldn't.
Either way the fact that there's no connection point at the top of the tower would lead me to believe that there may not be any paneling after all. The tops of those tower would move quite a bit with wind and the force of the trains going through.
BleauxJays said:
I don't think the bolts would necessarily need to be inspected regularly.The tops of those tower would move quite a bit with wind and the force of the trains going through.
You kinda contradicted yourself. Your second statement is reason the bolts would need to be inspected regularly.....
Nick
But look at any high rise building. Those sway a bunch, but you don't inspect bolts holding the steel members in place. Once they're torqued you're done. You inspect bolts on Coaster supports because you have massive dynamic loading hundreds of times every day. The bolts tend to shift and come loose.
That's why I said it depends on how the engineer would classify the bolts holding the two tower sections together.
You must be logged in to post