Top Thrill Dragster 2022 Status

The four-station setup was Intamin's solution to being able to launch a train every 45 seconds (which they never really could do because the system didn't reset fast enough), and that in turn was a solution to the problem of running really short trains. The idea is that 18 riders every 45 seconds is the same capacity as 36 riders every 90 seconds. That also doubles the available dwell time in the station because instead of dispatching every 45 seconds, you can dispatch two trains every 90 seconds. So for the purposes of unloading and loading, the two pair of trains are treated as a single unit, then split apart on the two staging blocks downtrack of the station.

Now that the ride has been running for a while, the park has a better idea of what a realistic dispatch interval is. Furthermore, if we assume the new trains will look something like the ones we've been ogling based on the strong hints coming from Italy, it's likely that they will have no seat belts (only a safety strap on the lap bar) and perhaps a more accommodating design resulting in faster loading and unloading. Could it be that the system can operate fast enough to allow for flush loading, thus eliminating the need for an unload station on about a 60-second interval?

Or, another possibility, perhaps the new trains can't fit into the space provided by the unload curve? That might require redesigning the platform to achieve the necessary clearance between the track and the platform. It wouldn't be a problem in the loading station because the track there is straight; on the unload track it's a curve, which would require a wider space to accommodate the train. Personally, I think this is less likely the case than the idea of reconfiguring the load/unload setup just because of the existence of concrete saws...

--Dave Althoff, Jr.



/X\ *** Respect rides. They do not respect you. ***
/XXX\ /X\ /X\_ _ /X\__ _ _____
/XXXXX\ /XXX\ /XXXX\_ /X\ /XXXXX\ /X\ /XXXXX
_/XXXXXXX\_/XXXXX\_/XXXXXXX\_/XXX\_/XXXXXXX\__/XXX\__/XXXXXX

RideMan:

it's likely that they will have no seat belts (only a safety strap on the lap bar)

That would be a welcome change, even though the safety strap is totally unnecessary.

No seat belt? I didn't think it was a realistic possibility that Cedar Point, the company that added seat belts to Cedar Creak Mine Ride and Corkscrew after 30+ years incident-free operation, would build a high-thrill ride without seat belts. Ever.

Last edited by 0g,
Scott Cameron's avatar

I think he meant something akin to Maverick's restraints. With a "seatbelt" that connects restraint to the base rather than one that goes across the waist.

Exactly.

The aforementioned sample car has the kind of lap bars that Maverick *should* have (and that Shoot The Rapids II *did* have). Note that none of the Cedar Point rides with overhead restraints (except possibly Power Tower?) has seat belts, though most do have a safety strap that attaches to the restraint. Done right, those straps are easier to operate than traditional seat belts, and a *lot* easier for attendants to check. Given that this is Cedar Point, I fully expect that the new Dragster seats (assuming they use the overhead lap bars) will have straps on the restraint, but will probably forego the sort of seat belts the old trains had.

--Dave Althoff, Jr.



/X\ *** Respect rides. They do not respect you. ***
/XXX\ /X\ /X\_ _ /X\__ _ _____
/XXXXX\ /XXX\ /XXXX\_ /X\ /XXXXX\ /X\ /XXXXX
_/XXXXXXX\_/XXXXX\_/XXXXXXX\_/XXX\_/XXXXXXX\__/XXX\__/XXXXXX

When I said "seat belt", I was including both the tradition seat belt like Magnum, Millennium, Steel Vengeance; as well as what you are referring a strap that attaches to the restraint. In my previous post, I was referring to the fact that Cedar Point has the redundant belt-style restraint regardless of it being recommended or required by the manufacturer. Meanwhile, Universal is operating Velocicoaster without the extra restraint.

Scott Cameron's avatar

Yeah, those Orlando parks are like the wild west. No seatbelts, letting riders check their own restraints. I feel much safer at CF parks (rolls eyes).

Kevinj's avatar

Disney does a good job of covering up all the cases of lost children that have flown out of their coasters. Every month a few new "dolls" get added to It's a Small World.

Last edited by Kevinj,

Promoter of fog.

vwhoward's avatar

^^Well there was a park in Orlando that did have a restraint/rider/operator situation that turned tragic so....


Joe
Eat 'em up, Tigers, eat 'em up!

Scott Cameron's avatar

Yes that's true and my light hearted comment certainly wasn't trying to poke fun at that situation at all. By Orlando parks I was referring to the big 3 operators in the area and not the local carnivals.

RideMan:

Or, another possibility, perhaps the new trains can't fit into the space provided by the unload curve? That might require redesigning the platform to achieve the necessary clearance between the track and the platform. It wouldn't be a problem in the loading station because the track there is straight; on the unload track it's a curve, which would require a wider space to accommodate the train. Personally, I think this is less likely the case than the idea of reconfiguring the load/unload setup just because of the existence of concrete saws...

Are you talking a set-up similar to Millennium Force possibly? That set-up is perfect in my opinion.


I'm back! Still the biggest Rougarou fan you'll ever meet. ;)

heric's avatar

Great new video from ElToroRyan, video states when it's from his source vs. his personal speculation:

  • Further confirmation on Zamperla
  • 2024
  • No layout changes
  • 4 lightning train operations
  • New paint scheme being tested on supports
  • Possible new theme to the whole midway

Last edited by heric,
vwhoward's avatar

We gotta have a laugh react here. Gotta love "great new video" from YouTube sources! Oooh...it even includes paid promotions! 🤣🤣🤣

Last edited by vwhoward,

Joe
Eat 'em up, Tigers, eat 'em up!

heric's avatar

I agree YouTube content varies greatly but I do not think your comments accurately depict his channel.

These claims are heavy aligned to what a lot in this thread already think is going to happen with TTD.

Just looking to spark some discussion.

Last edited by heric,
vwhoward's avatar

Nah...I would say there are 100 videos just like this. And it does align with what the discussion has been saying. Because of sources? Nope. Because of common sense.


Joe
Eat 'em up, Tigers, eat 'em up!

DRE420's avatar

It does seem to be the most believable and rational of all the videos I have seen so far so I won't knock the guy, plus his other content isn't horrible.

vwhoward's avatar

So he's credible for stating the obvious? Cool.


Joe
Eat 'em up, Tigers, eat 'em up!

eChameleon's avatar

Settle down tiger, nobody even uttered the word "credible" until you.

DRE420's avatar

Calm down vw, no need to get all in a tiz over a video and some comments on said video.

I love his videos, very in depth. I'd be excited for a space theme and tie in with Magnum. His problematic coaster series is fantastic.

Last edited by James Parker jr,

CP Coaster Top 10: 1. Steel Vengeance (40 rides to date) 2. Top Thrill Dragster (191 launches to date, 4 rollbacks) 3. Magnum XL 200 4. Millennium Force 5. Maverick 6. Raptor 7. GateKeeper 8. Valravn 9. Rougarou 10. Gemini

Closed topic.

POP Forums app ©2024, POP World Media, LLC - Terms of Service