There are many 285 foot roller coasters. Why not add another 15 feet?
*** This post was edited by DJ 10/14/2002 6:41:13 PM ***
------------------
Michael McCormack CP '02: 49
Magnum XL 200: 452 (577)
Millennium Force: 12
Wicked Twister: 33
-Stephen
So if Cedar Point is spending all this money on such a short ride, wouldn't the park want to make it worth the effort and cost?
------------------
James Draeger
-Captain Sarcasm
I asked this in another spot but I haven't seen an answer: Is there a real L-TH-B coaster out there somewhere? What Park is it in and/or what is it called?
OK, just kidding.ΓΏ
-Stephen
The track is almost at 200 feet, and isn't even vertical yet. If the ride was in the 300 foot range, there would be to little vertical track for the coaster to operate with. If you compare the incline on the new coaster to that of other big rides. you'll realize that the bigger the pullout, the taller the coaster. The pullout here is to big for anything under 400 feet.
Thats just my 2 cents though :)
------------------
--Dingo 65--
http://rct.ogresnet.com
------------------
Guess who's back....back again ;)
Do you guys need a towel or what? Enjoy the fun of the anticipation and move on to the next amusment.
Just think whats coming next year...or the one after that...:)
------------------
"If we go any faster, she'll blow apart for sure!"
------------------
Anden?
CoasterBob said:
Stephen - It took 11 years for CP to go from 200' to 300'! Even if we say that to get to 400' will take 1/2 that amount of time, 2003 is only 3 years after the opening of MF. That's why I am thinking roughly 350'.
And Cedar Point doesn't build two coasters in two consecutive years.
------------------
Tommy Penner - Variable X
Cedar Point FanBoy since 2001. || Cruiser Boy since 2002.
"Pessimistic people are the happiest people on the planet. They're either right or pleasantly surprised."
Think about what the issues are: 1)Higher speed needs bigger wheels. This is doable. 2)Taller hills need taller/bigger/wider support structures. I think we have seen that Cedar Point has consistently been able to build whatever type of structure is necessary. 3)High Speeds need Big Elements or brakes to keep the G's under control.
The pattern that I am seeing is that space is the main limitation on overall height of a ride, and I believe Cedar Point has a lot more room than many people think.
One last thought, about 50 years ago famous architect Frank Llyod Wright designed a skyscraper that would be a mile high. The base would have to take up 4 city blocks. The design is structurally sound. The only thing holding it back is cost, and now, terrorists.
Now we really don't need a mile-high building but the technology is there. The only limitations are space(4 city blocks) and money. Two things that I think Cedar Point has plenty of.
*** This post was edited by sigma one 10/17/2002 2:10:13 PM ***
You must be logged in to post