What is wrong with you guys?? Did I diss you guys?? NO! What I can't state my opinion?? RELAX!
*** Edited 11/28/2006 8:08:13 PM UTC by CPboy77***
I don't have any tattoos. I don't mind tattoos.
We're just stating our opinions (actually, they're facts, because we're always right) also, no need to get all defensive.
Loopy said:
It's tatooted people, not people with tattoos.
Did you eat beans before getting yours Loopy? Got some musical ink?
Goodbye MrScott
John
Well, you said you disagree with tattoos (an inanimate object made by injecting pigment into skin). I'm just curious if you say good night to the lamp before going to bed.
Or discuss politics with your school desk.
Or apologize to your school books for not giving them more attention.
Goodbye MrScott
John
Are you serious right now? People can disagree with tatoos! What's the big deal? You don't know what your talking about. Do you?
Not when you can't back it up. You made a sweeping generalization and then got pissy when someone called you on it.
You could try: "I think tattooed people are thugs because..." and then come up with reasons behind why you think as such.
After you've done that, don't get defensive when someone DISAGREES WITH YOU. That is part of a discussion. And the better you can back your opinions up, the less you are going to see in disagreement.
Goodbye MrScott
John
What does rediculous mean?
And honestly, we're not the obnoxious ones. I mean, you have 123 posts, mostly in your own threads so you can see your name in lights.
I understand that you have a voice and that you're allowed to use it, but it gets old when you go into your little tirades and things about how everyone's "rediculous". Just calm down, man.
This conversation needs to end! Some people just don't understand! I think tatoos are gross! End of discussion! How else can I back that up? I said what I said! It's over! Move on!
Well, people disagreed with your claim that "thugs" are, how did you say it, oh yeah
CPboy77 said:
Ummm... No need for the attitude! "Thugs" gang looking, tatooted people, not family oriented!
And some came out to say that having tattoos has nothing to do with being a "thug" and that there are plenty of tattooed people with families.
Goodbye MrScott
John
What's the matter man? We have you in a corner and you're afraid to admit you're wrong?
You've made a very broad generalization about people with tattoos and the like. What's next? You going to say we shouldn't allow people with crazy hair colors in, either? I think someone from this very forum would beg to differ with you on both points.
I'll say it again. "Thug" is not so much a look, as it is a way of acting. I will agree with you that the crowds at GL are less than "polite", so to speak, but whether or not they have tattoos makes no bearing on the way they act.
You must be logged in to postArchived.