------------------
'02, '03 Foods Area Sup (area 3)
I also think arearew has a valid point, if you value your job, especially ride ops yet again, STOP and STAY CLEAN or get help!
------------------
2003 - Gemini Crew
------------------
MANTIS ROCKS 2002 & 2003
------------------
Drop me a line if you feel like it
aarone_03@yahoo.com
olympic10086 said:
When is the drug testing, when we process in?
Yeah, after you visit Park Op, they will send you to First Aid which is where you will take it.
------------------
Screamsters 2001
Millennium Force/Screamsters 2002
Rip Cord/Screamsters 2003
------------------
Rachel: Hi Pheebs.
Phoebe: Hi!
Rachel: Hi! I just want to apologize. I’m really sorry I was a baby.
Phoebe: That’s ridiculous Rachel, we were all babies once. . .Oh, you mean today!
Rachel: Yeah.
Theres one position at knotts that requires a credit check. I forget where it is though.
Jo
2000/2002 Raptor Crew
Lifetime Raptor flights: 708 :) (goin for 1k in '03)
------------------
It's all about getting around the barrels, or over the fences, right leads, no faults, fastest time and looking pretty when done. What's so hard about that? :)
------------------
~Lee~
Group Sales ATL '01
Group Sales TL '02
Park Admissions Zone 5 Supervisor '03
----------------------
"The greatest leaders don't take credit for their actions; they don't have to."
MF_BDogg said:
The case brought before the supreme court in 2002 (No. 01-332) states that school districts may drug test because it "reasonably serves the School District's important interest in detecting and preventing drug use among its students" This can be taken in context that it is in Cedar Points "important interest" (safety) to detect and prevent drug use amongst its employees. In this way yes it is valid according to the constitution (in the eyes of the supreme court, our nations highest court) to drug test because it is in the greater interest of society and it doesnt violate the illegal search and seizure amendment that was being challenged.
------------------
Cedar Creek Trading Co. 1999
MF 2002
Sky Ride ATL 2003
*** This post was edited by MF_BDogg 4/24/2003 10:04:24 PM ***
Unfortunately you are correct in stating that drug testing is constitutional under certain circumstances. The case that you sighted was Pottawatomie County, Oklahoma v. Earls,122 S.Ct.2559(2002). What you failed to state was that this was a narrow (5-4) decision. Perhaps in another 5 or 10 yrs this type of fascism will be reversed(sorry I just had to say that). Narrow decisions are often reversed as the make up of the court changes(the old Jim Crowe laws come to mind).
The Indiana Court of Appeals ruled that random drug testing policies were unconstitutional under the Indiana Constitution in August 2000.(Linke v. Northwestern Sch.Corp.,734N.E.2d252(Ind.Ct.App.2000).The Indiana Supreme Court reversed this decision the summer of 2002.
Drug testing does appear to decrease drug use...
http://www.sportsafe.com/IN%20survey.PDF
The above study is a simple 4 page analysis that defeats my arguement against drug testing.
Our constitution is the greatest written document(ok besides the bible)created by man. It does not however address every little nook and cranny of human behaviour in a direct manner. Rather it leaves most of the decision making up to the legislative branch of our government. Thus in that manner it does address drug testing.
My argument in this case has failed and I am wrong!
------------------
Jeff
Webmaster/GTTP - Sillynonsense.com
"Pray that your country undergoes recovery!" - KMFDM
------------------
2003 - Gemini Crew
Jeff said:
"Fascism?" Uh, OK.------------------
Jeff
Webmaster/GTTP - Sillynonsense.com
"Pray that your country undergoes recovery!" - KMFDM
Well come on...I said I was wrong in stating that drug testing was unconstitutional. That is different from believing that it is unjust. And I also stated clearly that it was a simple opinion akin to "I dont like rain" ect.
I even stated the case law why I was wrong. I just know that someone here would have done it just to back up their point so why waste time.
So yes I feel that drug testing is plainly wrong however it is constitutional. By the way...Pro Lifers feel that abortion is wrong and it is constitutional...whats the difference? Ok I know I gonna start a hail storm so I will get out my umbrella!
Have fun with the argument Jeff, and I am truly sorry about your little kitty! I have 3 of the little monsters myself!~
------------------
2001 - Hooray For Hollywood
2002 - Hooray For Hollywood: The Sequel
LiveEdavid said:
Jeff, I fully agree with you, I would never want to get on a plane with a pothead pilot ;) however, being in a show, unless that was affecting my work on the job, i don't think a drug test is necesssary to ensure safety, or quality of work assuming it is compliant with a contract------------------
2001 - Hooray For Hollywood
2002 - Hooray For Hollywood: The Sequel
Intellectually I know that your analysis is correct on many levels.
I just dont like drug testing; however because i strive to be intelllectually honest and dont mind admitting that I am wrong on the constitutionaltity of drug testing; I have checked at least 10 cases through the use of the briefs thru gigalaw.com I found that the prevailing thought of the judicial system is not in line with my opinion; therefore I repeat my admission of being flawed in my attempt at a legal anaylisis.
An anaylisis is different than an opinion; kinda like what type of verhicle that one would drive. In other words my opinion is meaningless in my argument and Jeff as well as FUN is correct
By the way try not to do legal research through the use of WESLAW.
As an amature researcher I strive to be honest, I was wrong in this instance. Kudos to Jeff and the rest.
A true resarcher is non-biased as Jeff will attest too.
I like to think that I am right in all that I say, but darn it I just could not say it honestly.
You must be logged in to post