Wow, they are flying fast.
-Spike is almost complete
-Paint is complete on top hat
-Trains are at Cedar Point (Should be put on track "Soon")
-LSMs are installed and have begun testing
Can't wait to ride, looks like they are going to have a lot done before the winter weather hits!
Would be cool if they had a first rider auction for the day of the solar eclipse. “Drive the Sky” would take on a new meaning.
Wait, are they planning to be open in some capacity on eclipse day?
Well, per the latest Lake Erie Lifestyles upload, they have indeed started loading cars onto the transfer. At the time they were flying, it looks like they had one blue car and 2 white cars on the transfer with another (still wrapped) car in the process of being brought over. Outside of the notion that they could be doing some kind of super early testing, I'm wondering why they would load the cars on now and expose them to the harsh winter weather as opposed to keeping them in a climate controlled storage area.
-Adam G- The OG Dragster nut
Does the exposure really matter? Aside from when they are being overhauled, every car/ride vehicle sits outside all winter. Even if testing is a ways off, getting them onto the track now confirms that they do in fact fit on the track, gets them out of the way, and checks a step off the list.
Plus, any testing they can get done now, even if it's the "boring" stuff like moving trains between blocks, etc., is testing they don't have to do come spring.
And they can always wrap them up right on the track for winter in a few weeks.
Brandon
TTD 120mph:
I'm wondering why they would load the cars on now and expose them to the harsh winter
So they can get accustomed to the Ohio winters. Remember, these trains are from Italy where it's in the 60's right now. They're likely in a state of shock, what with all their new surroundings.
Best to get it over with now.
Promoter of fog.
I'm wondering where on the schedule some of the remaining stuff will fall.
We're still waiting on another station roof support column, right? I don't remember seeing confirmation/denial of a separate load/unload platforms, or much about the station interior yet at all.
Was the new gift shop a remodel of the speed zone building, or a teardown/rebuild? Were the midway improvements limited to just what they showed in the concept art, or is there still more to reveal?
Kinda surprised the bleachers are still there. Why bother to work around it if it's not staying?
Kevinj:
So they can get accustomed to the Ohio winters. Remember, these trains are from Italy where it's in the 60's right now. They're likely in a state of shock, what with all their new surroundings.
First step is moving them around on and off storage tracks, making sure the bits are all programmed right.
Jeff - Advocate of Great Great Tunnels™ - Co-Publisher - PointBuzz - CoasterBuzz - Blog - Music
I don't think there will be seperate load/unload with only three trains as having it would just make things more complicated and require more staffing with little benefit provided with three trains and negative benefit provided if they ever have to run two trains.
The launch cycle seems to take about 45 seconds from start to train clearing the tophat, but that does not include time to move the train from the station (or possibly a staging position in front of the station) to the launch position and switch the track back and forth. My guess is a 72 second interval is best case, but 80 seconds is more realistic. With a 20 passenger train, that puts capacity at 900-1000 per hour. I don't see how it can be any better than that, but hopefully it won't be much worse.
-Matt
I wonder if there's some kind of physical interlock on the switch track that prevents launch motors from working if it isn't in place.
Jeff - Advocate of Great Great Tunnels™ - Co-Publisher - PointBuzz - CoasterBuzz - Blog - Music
The locking pins (grey end of switch track facing tower) seem to have wires running from them or near them. I imagine that's not the only one my my bet would be those are position sensors. Possibly with one in the pin to confirm a seat in the next section of rail it's supposed to lock into and on in or near the actuator to confirm position.
I don't know but I would imagine that's a designed in feature.
Still haven't been able to uncross these circuits...
DJ Fischer
I'm sure there are sensors, but they can break or be wrong or programming can be wrong in some weird edge case. I'm talking about a mechanical interlock. For example, a lot of high-voltage systems (broadcast transmitters come to mind) have interlocks where if the maintenance door is open, they can't physically be energized unless they are mechanically closed. The circuit (presumably a low-voltage line closing a contactor) is incomplete when they're not closed, so no juice.
Jeff - Advocate of Great Great Tunnels™ - Co-Publisher - PointBuzz - CoasterBuzz - Blog - Music
Oh, great point. I wonder if the locking pins themselves make enough contact to be used that way.
Still haven't been able to uncross these circuits...
DJ Fischer
Jeff:
For example, a lot of high-voltage systems (broadcast transmitters come to mind) have interlocks where if the maintenance door is open, they can't physically be energized unless they are mechanically closed. The circuit (presumably a low-voltage line closing a contactor) is incomplete when they're not closed, so no juice.
I am struggling with how this works without a switch. I do not have an electrical background (I hate wires), but I am comparing your example to my furnace. The access panel that I open up to get to the blower has a switch on it. When the door is in position the switch is closed and the blower runs. With the panel open the switch is open and the blower is interlocked to not be able to run. Is that what your example is or is it something different than that?
I am trying to figure out how to do an interlock without a switch of some sort.
Well, for high voltage enclosures, a circuit breaker usually includes a mechanical interlock that requires the door to be closed in order for the breaker to close. These can usually be defeated manually if needed, since it's often literally nothing more than a mechanism that protrudes when the breaker is engaged, and if that mechanism doesn't make contact with the enclosure door, the breaker won't engage/close.
I think what Jeff is talking about is a low voltage (e.g. 24VDC) circuit that uses the track position to maintain continuity (as in, electrical contacts mounted to the switch track), and in the event that electrical continuity is interrupted, a relay is triggered which opens a separate electrical high voltage contactor, disabling the launch power.
Not sure if that makes sense or clarifies it at all...
Brandon
Lake erie lifestyles deserves to be on the first ride for all the updates and promoting of the ride!
Yeah, nothing pleases a park's marketing department like snooping over their fence.
Jeff - Advocate of Great Great Tunnels™ - Co-Publisher - PointBuzz - CoasterBuzz - Blog - Music
Question for you Jeff, how do they get away with that? Isn't CP a no drone zone?
That there Clark is an RV.....
FAA resource for where you can fly, says it all clear for drones.
New for 2024- Wicked Twister Plus
Got it but can't CP implement their own no fly zone? Or is that not considered their space? You would think they could implement it for the safety of the riders and all, in case of a malfunction or malicious attack.
That there Clark is an RV.....
CP is not the FAA. They can say, "You can't fly a drone from the ground in our property," but the drone is no different from a helicopter or small plane. Remember, when the sports complex was an airport, there were aircraft flying over the park constantly.
Jeff - Advocate of Great Great Tunnels™ - Co-Publisher - PointBuzz - CoasterBuzz - Blog - Music
Yep, and before drones and winter tours, someone flying a plane overhead was the only look many of us would get during the off-season.
Neil and Victoria :
Lake erie lifestyles deserves to be on the first ride
Lifetime ban just for the creepy voice-over they use on their videos.
Promoter of fog.
That’s Bella. And there’s quite a discussion about that on line, with viewers asked to vote for her narration, the creator’s narration, or a combination of both. I vote for the guy but there was a cute update where they talk to each other and banter back and forth.
I personally get sick of hearing the synth voice, and there is so much of it these days. Especially on things like recipes and reels.
What seems to be really creepy is the people commenting on their videos as if they believe Bella is a real person.
Assuming they are launching drones from a public place...are they flying them from Battery Park? That is nearly 2 miles away...over water. I don't know what the range is for a typical drone but that sounds pretty risky.
"You can dream, create, design and build the most wonderful place in the world...but it requires people to make the dreams a reality."
-Walt Disney
Range is calculated in flight time. 30 minutes. 2 hours. 2.5 hours. Etc. I can see that flight easily being within a 2 hour run. Get on a boat and it's even less.
Range is theoretically infinite. As far as the radio frequency signal will go at least. So the control limit last I brushed up the topic was line of sight.
Side tangent on radio range, with the right equipment you could get wifi from the ground on the ISS. I've seen it done across the great lakes as a demonstration. It's all dependant on the hardware transmitting and receiving.
Still haven't been able to uncross these circuits...
DJ Fischer
Two miles with no hills in between is easy enough for most of the DJI's. And if you spend a grand or more, you buy the replacement insurance. I sure did for mine, and I use it mostly for fun. I used it for a few shots for my movie, but since that's also for fun, it kinda blurs the line as "commercial" and requiring a license. 🙂
Jeff - Advocate of Great Great Tunnels™ - Co-Publisher - PointBuzz - CoasterBuzz - Blog - Music
The creepy voiceover isn't nearly as bothersome as the overuse of adjectives, in my opinion.
The brave workers are meticulously installing the strong bolts by carefully using their incredible torque wrenches, attaching the beautiful track to the expertly-designed supports, which is painted in a breathtaking red hue, which is especially difficult in the windy winds.*
*Not an actual quote, but not far off from reality.
I appreciate the content, but the narration kills me a little with each video.
Jeff:
Yeah, nothing pleases a park's marketing department like snooping over their fence.
Exactly! I mean, who would ever even do such a thing?!? :)
Kidding, of course, as I assume PB discussed these flyovers with the park first.
Brandon
I seem to remember on a previous episode, maybe back to Boardwalk, where they indicated access to space above was limited and the zoom was necessary for “close ups”. I’m trying to think whether the entirety of these recent TT2 might be shot with a zoom.
I wonder if that is indeed the case as I don't recall any of the footage being from directly above, mainly offset shots. For a hot minute I was thinking they parked & launched fro the area outside the parking lot booths such as near the fake evergreen tree. But I imagine CP Security would shoo them from there.
Tony addressed the drone traffic and I believe a specific instance of overhead drone footage 2-3 times when he was interviewed on the coasterradio podcast. If I'm not mistaken, he did say it was not allowed/illegal. There were some photos going around during the excavation process of the spike footer that were definitely overhead shots
djDaemon:
Exactly! I mean, who would ever even do such a thing?!? :)
Kidding, of course, as I assume PB discussed these flyovers with the park first.
I did not discuss the photos with anyone at Cedar Point beforehand.
The pilot circled the park and didn't fly directly over. He told me he avoids flying over the park as a courtesy, even though FAA rules would have allowed him to do so as long as he stayed at least 1,000 feet above the tallest object.
Besides, Cedar Point's prohibition is specific to drones. They have a risk factor that planes don't have.
And you can fly a drone over private property, provided that you're following the other various FAA rules. The altitude is harder to interpret, because I believe that you need a license to go over 400 feet, but I think the rule is "400 feet above the highest objects" or something like that, which would mean you could go up to 820 feet. You're still not supposed to fly over people, which I saw someone flagrantly doing yesterday at an event.
Jeff - Advocate of Great Great Tunnels™ - Co-Publisher - PointBuzz - CoasterBuzz - Blog - Music
https://drone-laws.com/dron...s-in-ohio/
Good information to share...I really thought that there was a no drone zone over CP.
That there Clark is an RV.....
And speaking of Lake Erie Lifestyles, Matt made a post on FB indicating that he’s changed the name and content of his channel, suggesting that we look elsewhere for TT2 updates. He also said he’d offer an explanation at a later date. I have to wonder if it isn’t a cease and desist situation, or some kind of trouble. At any rate, it’s a shame.
The YouTube channel is still there, but all the videos are gone.
Walt:
Besides, Cedar Point's prohibition is specific to drones.
I was referring to the "snooping over their fence" aspect, which I found a tad hypocritical given the Maverick aerial photos, but points taken. But to Jeff's point, the park doesn't have jurisdiction over the airspace above their property.
RCMAC:
I have to wonder if it isn’t a cease and desist situation, or some kind of trouble.
If LEL didn't violate any FAA rules (admittedly a big "if"), and the park is scaring off a YouTuber via their attorneys, that would be a pretty disappointing abuse of their power. I understand that the park may not be a fan of someone flying a drone over their property, but so long as that person hasn't violated any FAA rules or broken any laws, the company is way out of line on this one.
Then again, maybe all CF has to prove is that employees were on property - somewhere, anywhere - at the time of the drone flights, which given the FAA prohibition against flying over people, would qualify as rule-breaking.
Brandon
You must be logged in to post