While the animation clips are great now, they aren't very interesting to watch when you can see the real thing less than 50 feet from where you are standing.
At this point, I'm very concerned over how they're going to handle the capacity with those very short trains. *** Edited 12/24/2006 1:26:23 AM UTC by Gomez***
-Craig-
2008:Magnum XL-200 | Top Thrill Dragster
2007:Corkscrew | Magnum XL-200 | Maverick
Capacity: Approx. 1,200 riders per hour
It's only about 400 less an hour than MF.
We all know it's going to be slow the first year if not longer. It's expected.
eat. sleep. ride! - Coaster apparel and accessories!
Ride on, MrScott!
When CP says Approx. that means on a fully staff perfect situation day. Basically NEVER. Look how well TTD got 1500 pph or better yet 800 pph on Skyhawk.
CP does a good job with its capacity, but Disney is amazing at doing the job. See Expedition Everest and Rock n' Roller Coaster for the most amazing capacity you can find a roller coaster. I've never saw anything like it.
-Craig-
2008:Magnum XL-200 | Top Thrill Dragster
2007:Corkscrew | Magnum XL-200 | Maverick
Loopy said:
Capacity: Approx. 1,200 riders per hour
It's only about 400 less an hour than MF.We all know it's going to be slow the first year if not longer. It's expected.
Actually, on a normal busy day on MF. The capacity is between 1000 and 1250. That's if things are going smoothly with seat belts and hitting interval. The rcdb capacity is incorrect.
^^
I'm pretty sure that I got that info from the CP website, which is where RCDB most likely got it also.
So their own site is incorrect too?
eat. sleep. ride! - Coaster apparel and accessories!
Ride on, MrScott!
You must be logged in to post