I remember riding max air in 2006 and realizing the ride time was longer than it was in 2005. So i wonder if the same will happen with skyhawk because its a great ride but to short. Max airs ride time was probably shorter in 2005 because it was new and lines were longer so they made the ride shorter to make lines move quicker. So do you think they will do the same with skyhawk?
*** Edited 5/12/2007 10:48:04 PM UTC by Break the sound barrier***
^ beat me to it.
All of the S&S Scremin' Swings have notoriously short ride times. They're pneumatically operated, and my guess is that they simply can't hold any more air in the tanks safely to extend ride time. Maxair, on the other hand, is just an electric motor, and they can make that run for (almost) as long as they want.
All of the S&S Scremin' Swings have notoriously short ride times. They're pneumatically operated, and my guess is that they simply can't hold any more air in the tanks safely to extend ride time.
Well I am going to have to disagree. The SS at Dorney Park (that you pay extra for) has a MUCH longer ride cycle. I remember watching it last year and saying, "why cant SkyHawk last that long".
Obviously this is just a guess, but I do think it will get longer eventually. They certainly can.
Promoter of fog.
The air receiver size and the compressor/drier capacity can easily extend the ride time. Starting the swing actually takes quite a bit more air than running full swing. Starting keeps full pressure on cylinder for the entire stroke. At full swing, full pressure is needed for only a portion of the stroke. As the air expands, it still pushes the cylinder at a reduced force.
The compressors maintain a pressure range in the receiver. Most compressors turn on when the pressure falls to a setpoint and then turns off when it gets up to another set point. Skyhawk's compressors operate different for better control of the pressure.
As for running the ride longer, It's just a matter of reprograming the ride sequence.
You must be logged in to post