He asked about violating the rules and it was pointed out how that's the wrong thing to do. That's entirely relevant to the original post. So, if people need to "lay off" of him, then we're just supposed to bow down and agree with everything everyone ever says or not post? That seems pretty idiotic.
A better analogy than noggin's, that is almost exactly what you asked, would be for you to order a beer at a bar, then as soon as the bartender turns away, hand it to your 15yo. Even a 20yo kid.
This is from your original post:
coasterblu said:
[...] my son is 15 and we understand that the minimum age to operate a jet ski rented from North Coast is 16, but do they really care? After it is rented, is it possible to just switch the driver or do they watch you?
Your initial post asked if you could deceptively obtain something (a jet ski rental) under the premise it was for you, then you would turn around and hand it to someone who is ineligible for it. How is that any different than the beer example, other than the jet ski not intoxicating your son?
The answer to your question of "is it possible to just switch the driver or do they watch you" is that you might be able to get away with it, but it doesn't matter, because that's the wrong thing to do. That's the wrong example to set for your son.
If you're not looking for advice on breaking the rules, stop asking if you can get away with breaking the rules and grow up. Jeez!
Not exactly but your question made me think of this http://www.lohud.com/story/news/crime/2014/12/17/eastchester-father-daughter-charged-pennsylvania-triple-fatal/20547103/
Closed topic.