Intamen's Engineering

Wicked Twister during may june and july. anyone remember that?

------------------
Ed Markey is my anti-drug.
Rollercoasters have proven to cause brain damage in stupid politicians. DAR-HOOT

trips to CP:6 Dragster:2 MFer:6 Magnum: 13 Running with the bulls for a 15 minutes dragster wait, Must be June!

Wicked Twister was a semi-prototype ride. But look at it now, it has some downtime like every other ride in the park, but it's an awesome ride. :)

------------------
"Scream early, because once you reach 420 feet no one will hear you."-Rob Decker

Yeah but WT is no where near where it was in its opening weeks. Now i know that wont happen with Dragster, since you need to go over the hill, but the past two Intamin rides have got me hoping for a B&M for the next coaster, lol.
As another who is pretty close to being an engineer, here's my take.

With WT's structural problems, let me add how difficult it must have been to model those spikes. I don't have much experience doing so, but when it comes to complex frames and dynamic forces, it can be pretty tricky. Some seemingly simple two dimensional analysis of frames aren't so. Add a twist in there, and bam, you've got fun times ahead.

Mantis man, you hit it right on the head as far as testing goes. This industry doesn't have as much leeway when it comes to testing.

I once heard Xcelerator puts out around 9,000 horsepower, which isn't that far off from Dragsters. Although, it's certainly a much bigger system. I haven't heard too much as to if it's the hydraulic system that's been causing all the downtime, or the ride computer.

\Frankly, I wouldn't be surprised if it's more because of the computer. The 'report' metioned elsewhere about the train partially launching, then stopping sounds computer to me. When you think about all the sensors that ride has, it's no wonder. The whole strip of 'em just to move the trains in pairs is really amazing. I can't help but wonder how long the code is for Dragster's PLC. I've heard your average ride has almost 200 pages worth, and that's with signifcantly fewer sensors.

X? I don't want to get to into it, but I was there on a Thursday and it was closed for 'weekly maintenance' then too. No sign at the front gates, heck, not even a sign by the ride apologizing for the incovenience. All three trains were in the bay, sitting fully assembled, not a worker in sight.

------------------
VertiGo rides: 32
2002 Raptor Crew
"Hey, Cool. My voice is on the lift"

Xcelerators launch system puts out 10,000 horses, just like TTD's. They may not always be used, but I have some pretty convincing video thats how that they DID launch Xcel at well over 100 mph, it crested the top hat at around 40 mph...

Xcelerator had a few problems with blown pumps and cracked piston heads in it's 1st few months of operation (a cracked piston head sent it down for a whole week during Halloween Haunt!). But the main problems with Xcelerator are allignment issues. Many times, the train rolls back to engage the pulley and the dog misses the slot, causing the train to roll back behind the pulley. That's the main reason why Xcel goes down now-a-days.

Xcel has a 8,200 HP motor, its not like it is top secret. and it was also said that TTD could use the same motor, but they decided to go bigger so it wouldn't strain as much. it is comparable to over-clocking your CPU yeah it can do it but it will over heat. i am confident that TTD could launch trains at over 122 MPH!

------------------
Ed Markey is my anti-drug.
Rollercoasters have proven to cause brain damage in stupid politicians. DAR-HOOT

trips to CP:6 Dragster:2 MFer:6 Magnum: 13 Running with the bulls for a 15 minutes dragster wait, Must be June!

All the stories are getting me confused. Is it a problem with the hydraulics in the launch or the brakes? I heard somewhere that they can't keep the brakes on the launch down. I've also heard that it is the launch itself that is the problem.

Either way I hope it's running by the end of them month when I'm up there.

------------------
-Mike

The Fast and the Fearless

Please take this for what its worth, because I only heard it as hearsay.

Chatting with someone who claims to work for the company that manufactured the sensors for TTD, she told me that the sensors were not initially installed properly.

I obviously do not know if this is true, but I was wondering 2 things:

1. Is it a company that has people in Cleveland that makes sensors for Intamin's coasters?

2. If the sensors (even a few of them) were installed improperly, what would happen?

Could sensors being improperly installed cause computer problems, affecting the ride's operation? Or is that a poor explanation for at least some of the downtime?

-Sam

------------------
Avalanche Run - My first Roller Coaster.
Magnum XL-200 - The BEST Roller Coaster!

Pete's avatar

monster said:


By the way, is there a spell check on this? I am good with numbers, not spelling.


Get iespell. It's a free spell checker that checks text boxes on Internet Explorer. Go to: http://www.iespell.com/


------------------
Florida may have Disney World and Key West,
but Ohio has Cedar Point and Put-In-Bay.
It's great to live in Ohio!

The green sensors you see dotted all over the track are manufactured by Pepperl & Fuchs. They're a pretty large worldwide company, and you'll see their sensors in use on just about any coaster. I'm unsure if they have a location in Cleveland, but my guess is no.

I'm nowhere near an expert on these sensors, but in my experience with them, to be installed improperly they'd have to:

-Have their wires on the wrong terminals. There's only three.

-Be too far away from the object to be 'sensed.' This seems more like a track issue, as they're held in place by a trough.

If they were installed wrong, I'd think there'd be computer issues. The computer doesn't know a section is clear, when it really is, due to a faulty sensor. Ride E-stops. That seems like the kind of thing they would have encountered during initial testing of the ride, meaning the problem is now fixed.

I could be wrong on most of this, as there's much more than just those green 5-way proximity sensors on the ride.

------------------
VertiGo rides: 32
2002 Raptor Crew
"Hey, Cool. My voice is on the lift"

Pete's avatar
Pepperl & Fuchs has a location just south of Cleveland:

PEPPERL+FUCHS
3234 Reimer Rd
Norton OH 44203
US
Contact: Greg Stansky, District Manager
gstansky@us.pepperl-fuchs.com
Phone: 330-289-0938
Fax: 330-706-9673
http://www.am.pepperl-fuchs.com


------------------
Florida may have Disney World and Key West,
but Ohio has Cedar Point and Put-In-Bay.
It's great to live in Ohio!

If anyone cares, here some of that footage I mentioned about Xcel breaking 100.

http://www.americacoasters.com/videos/xcel1.mov

It cycled a full 8 seconds faster from launch to brakes, Im too lazy to do the math but that means it was traveling around 30% faster than it normally does.
*** This post was edited by Josh B 6/9/2003 3:19:05 PM ***

ShiveringTim's avatar
Well, Dragster has enough sensors that an error in the wiring is possible. However, that should have been tested way before the trains were launched. I think the proxes on the track are OK, but perhaps some other sensor in the launch system (flow sensors, pressure sensors, rotational sensors) could be the problem. Just speculation at this point.

------------------
Scott W. Short
mailto:scott@midwestcoastercentral.com
http://www.midwestcoastercentral.com


monster said:
As a mechanical engineer, I have to question at what point does Intamin take responsibility for their poor design choices...

... I work for an aerospace company (design and manufacture of jet engines). If we had this type of track record, we would have been out of business a long time ago. And yes, a jet engine exceeds TTD in complexity, power and safety (of our product stops, them plane falls).


OK, sorry I don't like to flame but a fighter jet maintainer, I'm gonna have to bust the Hell out of you here... Did it occur to you that your company DOES have this bad of a track record? Crunch the numbers and relize your overlooking the obvious... My squadron has 10 fighters... and on the average ov er the two years I have been working here we MAY have 5 (50%) of them "up" at any given time... beyond that 2 of them have been damaged beyond reapair... and one crashed into the North Arabian Sea, nearly taking the whole fricken' carrier with it... Ok let's apply these numbers to Cedar Point:

Cedar Point has 16 rollar coasters, and over the past 2 years guests where lucky if 8 of them worked on any given day... Also in this time, a total of 3 of them had to replaced because two of them where irreparably damaged, and one crashed nearly killing everyone in the park...

Ok, now do you see how fricken' absurd your arguement is? The simple point is that jet engines brake down a whole hell of lot more than rollar coasters do, so don't give me that crap... I'm the one who's pullling 12-16 hour days to fix 'em... The diffrence there are a lot of jet engines and only on Top Thrill Dragster... so everyone notices when Top Thrill Dragster brakes down...

Your right though... jet engines are a lot more complex than rollor coasters... So let's think just how much devolopment, testing... Operation... Failure... Modification.... Repair... Testing... Operation.... Failure... etc... goes into a new jet engine? Because your telling me that your company can churn out a flawless engine over one winter, and that we can put it in all our planes and it will never brake down... Well darn dude... That makes my job a heck of a lot easier, I'm gonn a go buy a CP Season Pass now, since I'm gonna have so much more time off...

Ok Ok... I've had my fun... and I'm not flaming you for being dissapointed about TTD's performance... that's understandable... Just think Mister Engineer, before you put your foot in your mouth...


Josh B said:
If anyone cares, here some of that footage I mentioned about Xcel breaking 100.

http://www.americacoasters.com/videos/xcel1.mov



can i go over the top-hat that fast?!? ...thanx for the link
------------------
The B E S T SEVENTEEN s-e-c-o-n-d-s of SHEER >>InSaNitY<< I've E V E R experienced!


There have been some "problems" shall we say with the Tomcat engines over the last 20 some odd years (I think the powerplant is a TF-101??). Jet engines are not amusement park rides and likewise. To use an analogy based on one and apply it to another may be a lapse in logic. Who knows though!! I wanna ride the TTD!!!
------------------
Erie: The only great lake you can walk from end to end and only get oil on your shoes!
why couldn't CP have just added a few little hills or helixes like in xcel, that would make the ride even more fantastic!
Xcelerator doesnt have Hills or Helixes, Just a few boring overbanks. If they would the cost of the ride would be at least $40 mill.

You have feet right??...Go stroll on over to MF and ride that, How hard is that.

------------------
- Dennis
When I die, They'll read this And say a genius wrote it.
http://drinkduff.com/
*** This post was edited by Big D 6/9/2003 9:59:11 PM ***

If TTD had more track, I'm thinking it would definitely take MORE time between launches, which equals less people per hour. I'm thinking that is probably the #1 reason the ride ends after the 400 ft. Spiraling vertical drop.

Plus, I've seen more than a few people exit the ride in TOTAL SHOCK, looking like they just might never ride again. Not everybody can handle this intense of a ride. If it were longer, it just might be to much for the general public. ...Just my $.02.

------------------
The B E S T SEVENTEEN s-e-c-o-n-d-s of SHEER >>InSaNitY<< I've E V E R experienced!

Hey Suicide Speed, always enjoy your posts. I noted you are a F-14 Mech. Just wondered if you know my nephew, Mike Doxey, he flew off the Big Stick during Afgan. action as a F-14 RIO. (Diamondbacks)

Closed topic.

POP Forums app ©2024, POP World Media, LLC - Terms of Service