No, it actually would be THAT tall, as the ride itself drops "off the side of the building" as stated in the article. There is already a coaster ON the building, the one being talked about here would essentially use the building as a support. As far as I know, this plan has been tossed around for quite some time, and I could see it actually happen sometime in the future. Who knows.
------------------
Ross: Do you have a minute? I’d like to talk to you about something I’m, I’m really uncomfortable talking about.
Joey: Sure. What? About uh, you showering with your mom?
Ross: I actually had a topic in mind!
The 700+ ft. coaster got shot down quite a while ago, which is not even mentioned in this article.
------------------
Without upstops, airtime would have a whole new meaning!
------------------
Only 2 more days!!! (my GTTP sig)
................................................................................
I would rather hear synthesizers sing than hear rappers talk. (my universal sig)
Starcraft Dad said:
Makes me wonder though. If they keep adding rides to the top of this building was the building designed to keep taking on the added weight? I'm sure it was but sometimes you just got to wonder.
It's actually a legitimate concern... There has been some who have questioned the designers choices of adding rides to the structure...
You would think that people would plan that stuff, and calculate stress on the structure, but sadly, not everyone in this world thinks in terms of logic... Some think in terms of dollars and cents...
Ripcord Crew 2002 / MF Crew 2004
Yes the plans did go through the "ride" is called X-Scream and Its on top of the building and "teeter tooters back and forth.
here is a video of the ride so you know what im talking about X-Scream 1 X-scream 2
2009: Top Thrill Dragster Crew
2010: Millennium Force Crew
2011: Gemini Crew
2012: Assistant Team Leader of Maverick
2013: Team Leader of Gemini
Dragster Rollbacks: 4
You must be logged in to post