Do you think WT was supposed to be a "filler"?

Actually, I think the same thing as Anonymous. That makes sense, and tue, it did work. I never said that WT was a "filler" ride, but it seems like it to me.

Now I'm starting to think that CP is getting revenge on SFWoA. First, with a more twisted, 200ft. version of S:UE, and now a possible 400ft. coaster that will put SF out of it's misery. Hehehe, thats what you get SF...

------------------
LeWiS

Yeah, frankly, it wouldn't be bad if the owners of Geauga Lake (I think I spelled that wrong, not sure though) bought the park back. I honestly think the park was better when Six Flags didn't have anything to do with the park.

------------------
Turkeys, the only animal smarter than man

I think that what we're seeing built was in the works long ago, with the intent of smashing every record out there. WT is likely a quick install to ensure that all records will in fact be broken next year. I wouldn't call it filler, I'd call it... Oh crap! SFMM took the record, Let's move.
*** This post was edited by Snoopy 9/11/2002 2:06:43 PM ***

You must be logged in to post

POP Forums app ©2025, POP World Media, LLC - Terms of Service