I believe this rule is due to the unfortunate incident at Knott's. But seriously, this is a completely different set of circumstances as far as ride safetly goes. I'm extremely upset and dissapointed with CP for making this ludicris decision. Anyone have some insight into whether this rule is permenant, or just a temporary thing?
tg
This is going to kill capacity to. Everytime somone who comes up just short they will have to be let off, which involves releasing and rechecking restraints.
By the way. Whoever cuts the belts can't measure because I've noticed some belts are different length's. So if you fit in the test chair on either MF or Raptor dose not necessarily mean you will fit on the ride. Dumb Cedar Point
*** This post was edited by Joe E. on 9/30/2001. ***
[profanity removed... you know better. this is your only warning. i don't want that crap on my site. -J]
*** This post was edited by Jeff on 9/30/2001. ***
You must be able to fasten your own seatbelt to ride
The park owns the ride, and the park can set the rules for it as well (even if we don't agree with them - I'm with you on this).
But with the attention from Markey and others, and the death on PP from a large guest, I can see why CP is being a bit cautious. They don't want the Political Lens of Skeptcism pointed at their ride saftey, espically not with the biggest rollercoaster in the Western Hemisphere there (and whatever they've got up their sleeve for next year!) That being said, I wouldn't be suprised to see this rule relaxed if not completely erased by the time the park opens next year. Time will tell.
-Ken
Could someone give me a link to what happened on the other ride, PP?
(Sorry, I've been away from the computer for awhile)
coasterkingoftheworld said:
Safety is not the issue...
Wrong. Safety is always the issue. Walter and Claude designed a ride that could safely accomodate people of a certain size. While it does kill capacity when you need two ride ops to get a restraint down, the bigger issue is that you're putting forces on the restraint that weren't intended. The belt is stretched with continuous force against it, and the restraint itself is one or two clicks from open. Will it hold? Probably, but that's not a chance I'd be willing to take as a park operator.
I hate to say it, but enthusiasts don't have the expertise or the liability for the public's safety. So unless you want more blood-sucking lawyers jumping on every little knee scrape that happens in a park, you'd best let the experts address safety.
-----------------
Jeff
Webmaster/GTTP
Watch my grass grow: http://www.sillynonsense.com/subdivision/
I just find it Ironic that they would "suddenly" change the policy as if B&M and Intamin were the same company. I am no expert, but this means they may have been doing something wrong the last 6 years.
Nice to see that some people on here think that it is becasue of the ride operators not wanting the responsibility of possibly having something happen and having it blaimed on us. Don't you think that we put up with enough already in the course of an average day. We (the crew at MF) are actually a little upset at the fact that guests that got to ride last year and even this year are no longer allowed to ride due to the incidents at Knotts.
The worst part about it is that we have now we have to change policy right at end of the season and we have been kicking butt under the old policy. Safety is the issue though and the one thing that all of us want to do is make sure that you are safe, we work all day long making sure that you guys are safe and if you don't like the new policy you should not complain to the ride crews but to the management of the park.
Cedar Point employs us this means we follow Cedar Point rules and policies!
Jamin
-----------------
*** This post was edited by Joe E. on 10/1/2001. ***
Yes, it sucks when you have to upset someone like that, but there was a woman in California who, given the choice, would probably rather be embarassed than dead.
-----------------
Jeff
Webmaster/GTTP
Watch my grass grow: http://www.sillynonsense.com/subdivision/
I personably could tell the MF crew was off Friday Night. When they usually stack, it is only for a few seconds but the staking was consistent and for longer times.(This also may have had something to due with lack of regulars). However I totally agree on that ride this needs to be done until it is all sorted out.
On Raptor I do agree it will not kill capacity that much because of the ability to release individual rows instead of the whole train. Still if like mrh216 says a dozen people are turned away every few minutes it will hurt a little.
The only thing I don't agree with (I am actually somewhat pleased the way they handled MF) is why this rule was suddenly provoked on Raptor. If a DC-9 crashes due to a defected part should all Boeings be grounded too?
Is the ride safer now? Maybe. There is a point though when too much safety can infinge on our liberty's. This has more to do with just our silly coasters (which makes this debate seem minor). An example is our currently situation with the airline industry. If we have Interrogation, background checking, and lie detection before we can board will it make things safer? Yes (BTW, other counties do have this) Is it worth the hassle? That is a judgement call.
I guess Cedar Point thinks there is no compromise for safety, even if it involves angering people and turning them away. I guess that makes sense. I am glad this is not my decision to make :).
MF, for obvious reasons, doesn't have this problem.
It being cold out and people having extra clothing is not going to help either. Oh Well.
You must be logged in to post