-----------------
-Brian
One of us..
Creative coding
"Chetto panelview"
Duel means two
MDOmnis said:
I counted 289 stairs to the top of Magnum's lift. Shari counted 288. Andy says it is 289. Whatever number Frank was giving in his spiels WAS a bunch of bull.
As for the seagulls being a recording, tell that to somone (me) who got crapped on by them three times this season! I think that tied for the lead in that department.
lol MDOmins
-----------------
computer "access denied"
evan "now ill never know what cp is getting"
"wait here is my new password cracker"
computer"access granted ô¿ô oh its a .....transmission lost www.cp.com
LuvRaptor said:
Did you know?
Think MF is fast? The trains actually have the capability (given the space and time) to reach speeds of over 100mph
How do you mean this? That the trains themselves can go faster, if they were on a higher lift, or that the MF lift cable can actually speed the car up enough so that it'll hit 100MPH on the drop?
Because, it would need to be going about 57 MPH on the lift to hit that. (47MPH in a vacuum, but you'd need the extra 10 to overcome wind resistance to hit 100)
Jman
-----------------
Jman
Webmaster, Gravibulb Coasters
http://balder.prohosting.com/gravbulb/coasters/
*** This post was edited by Jman on 12/4/2001. ***
The first steam Locomotive's to top 100 MPH were produced after W.W.I and those things were huge with big boilers and lots of drive wheels. I took a look in CPQOAWP and the first 2 engines dates back to 1902 and 1911. I'm not sure of the actual date of all our engines but since they were reconstructed they could have been upgraded to reach 100.
Still our biggest engine now is probably George and I think he has a 0-2-1 setup (No back wheels, 2 drives wheels and a front load wheel on each side.) I did some quick Internet research and most of the engines that claim to break 100 MPH have at least 6 drive wheels.
Don't trust me though, I'm not a railroad engineer. (just a history buff :))
ucsigep said:
"
OldCPer said:
Nightime landscaping....now THAT would be a job I'd love.Is that like Night Putting with the Dean's daughter?
"I ain't payin' no 50 cent for no Coke." "Ah, then you ain't gettin' no Coke."Heh...not exactly, although who knows what the landscapers do in those bushes at night. They need an old broad like me to make sure they get all those flowers planted properly.
I'd rather die living than live like I'm dead
--Dave Althoff, Jr.
Who hasn't checked CP's machines.
So, If we pretend there is no friction and the standard train speed from a stopped position at the top of the hill is 80MPH. Then, if we watch the train getting pulled up the hill by the elevator travelling ot 12MPH the climb speed would then be added to fall speed and the train would fall at the normal 92 MPH. So presumably if the elevator lifted the train at a faster speed of 20MPH then the train would fall at 100MPH in a frictionless world. So, now the speed then has to be larger to overcome friction in the friction world. So lets say the elevator rises at 15MPH to achieve 92MPH and the elevator maybe rises at a speed of 24 to achieve 100MPH
Correct me if I'm totally wrong with this assumption, I didn't do any math, I just made up numbers. :) I didn't want to figure out the real data. :)
-----------------
2001 - Night Trash Removal
2002 - Something in the daytime... hopefully
Jman
-----------------
Jman
Webmaster, Gravibulb Coasters
http://balder.prohosting.com/gravbulb/coasters/
Really, a coaster should get a 40mph lift. big air ~ lol
-----------------
A lap bar is all you need!
my really bad website ~ www.expage.com/coasterpoint
That's what *I thought once. Until I went to buy gum from the machine and realized it was a JawBreaker :(
-Josh
-----------------
You must be logged in to post