Nope, CP_bound, Muckmack got it that time. There are four track sections on the transfer table (two for the running tracks, two for the switch). To the left of the running tracks, there are two extensions to serve as storage tracks. That's four (two on the storage tracks, two on the switch). There is also a single extension to the right downtrack of the switch. That's what doesn't make much sense. I can't think of any reason for taking five trains off of the running track on a six-train two-track coaster, since if they just want to run one train, they can just shut down one side and leave the train on the running track. Another interesting feature is that while there is only one storage track section to the right of the running track, the footers and structure are wide enough to accommodate a second track section.
Southeast Michigan coaster nut Mike Schulte had an interesting theory about this. He pointed out to me that Gemini was constructed at about the same time that Cedar Point was contemplating building a new park up in Michigan. His theory is that Gemini was originally intended to be the signature ride at that park...the park that didn't get built because they bought Valleyfair! instead. Gemini's capacity is close to 4,000 PPH which is ridiculous even for Cedar Point. But it isn't so ridiculous if it is the only major coaster in the park and the park is drawing a large crowd. So Mike's guess is that the ride was supposed to operate six trains, but have eight trains installed so that if something broke down, they could run the spare train(s) instead of dropping back to four-train operation. Two additional trains would necessitate the installation of six parking spaces.
It's an interesting theory. But I have to wonder...Cedar Point never had seven trains for that ride...why did they install five storage tracks?
--Dave Althoff, Jr.