------------------
Back from lurking
New account, same name
KW 2002
The last few times I rode it the trims were on very hard. It's bad when you take that first turn and fall to the right instead of getting thrown to the left.
------------------
2002 Magnum--199
The world I love, the trains I hop, to be part of the wave can't stop.
-Matt
2001 Magnum Crew
I usually don't advocate making a big deal of a park's misfortunes. But in the case of Mean Streak rolling back because of the way they mistreat the ride and because they won't let it run fast enough to clear the course...well, they deserve all the ridicule they get!
--Dave Althoff, Jr.
------------------
Jeff
Webmaster/GTTP, Sillynonsense.com
"We used to hate people, now we just make fun of them. It's more effective that way." - KMFDM, "Dogma"
It wouldn't be so bad if they slowed it down just a little. But they have it running so slow that it barely makes the second hill when it's fully loaded. The way it was running yesterday, riding it was a complete waste of time and effort...and it was a walk-on at the time.
The braking on the first drop was so heavy that...well, do you remember the "Toothchipper" in that one Simpsons episode? Because that's how it ran down the first drop. Ever notice that the last brake caliper on Mean Streak's first drop is lower than the top of the second hill? Well, if the train stops on that caliper, there is absolutely no way that it's going to make the second hill. Rather than fix the ride right (and I don't pretend to know exactly what that would require, although I'm convinced a different train design would help) they have come up with a "patch" that saves them some money, effort, and down-time. But what they have done is to cause Mean Streak to commit the cardinal sin of roller coasters: They've made it BORING.
Yes, I heard Monty's reasoning. I've heard it a couple of times. And it's "his" ride; he ought to know what he's doing with it. But that doesn't automatically mean that what he's doing is the best thing for the ride.
--Dave Althoff, Jr.
Why can parks run classic woodies that have similar intensity to MS and avoid putting trims ON THE FIRST DROP?!
I mean look at Ghost Rider. Look at The Pheonix. How about The Beast and Son of the Beast?
I didn't agree with Monty's reasoning after thinking of all of the twisters and out and backs out there that don't require this kind of manipulation to "keep maintenance costs down".
MS is a great ride, but deserves all of the criticism it is given. Maybe I should have reworded that sentence to "Cedar Point operates a great ride but they deserve all of the criticism they are given".
------------------
Jeff
Webmaster/GTTP, Sillynonsense.com
"We used to hate people, now we just make fun of them. It's more effective that way." - KMFDM, "Dogma"
------------------
Scott W. Short, Rail Junkie
mailto:scott@midwestcoastercentral.com
http://www.midwestcoastercentral.com
I still say that CP must think that they don't really have a problem with this ride. Because if they did I'm sure they'd fix it.
------------------
I was super before Superstew was cool!
------------------
"If we go any faster, she'll blow apart for sure!"
PINK FLOYD FANATIC said:
Opps I spelled weighlessness wrong!
Then use the 'Edit' feature to fix it.
Anyways, does Intamin build woodies? I've never heard of it. (Although I'm not saying it's not possible...)
------------------
Tommy Penner - Variable X
------------------
-Chris Woodard
Just because you can't justify charging $3 for a Pepsi doesn't mean you can't charge $3 for a Pepsi.
However, what makes you so sure that would fix anything? Ever consider it might be the structure itself that is inadequate?
------------------
Jeff
Webmaster/GTTP, Sillynonsense.com
"We used to hate people, now we just make fun of them. It's more effective that way." - KMFDM, "Dogma"
You must be logged in to post