Well, okay, DT is lame compared to the big coasters at CP - and, in my opinion, so is ID (my husband & I refer to ID as either "that waste of space" or "the p*ssy ride". However, if you think about it, if CP wants to attract all kinds of people & families, it needs to have some intermediate steps between the flat rides & the big coasters. And these "mild" coasters do make good training coasters for the youngsters. We haven't taken our son to CP yet, but we have taken him on other parks' "mild" coasters - eg, Big Thunder Mountain at Disney, & Zach's Zoomer & Mad Mouse at Michigan Adventure. We take him on those not so much because it's a big thrill for us, but because it's a good way to help him work up his "thrill tolerance". And it's fun to watch him on those rides - when you're 4 or 5, those are pretty big thrills! And, then, too, every once in awhile, we do like something smaller & calmer, like DT, like if we've just eaten or are tired, etc. There are times when I don't see the point of certain rides - but then I remember not everyone is like me, & CP is trying to be a "family park" with "something for everyone". If that's the market they want to appeal to, then I guess they'd better keep some "low thrills" coasters, much as we coaster lovers would prefer to replace them with "big thrills".
-------------
CheapRock
You can pick your friends & your nose, but you can't pick your seat on MF.