Ah, you see, while they were using hyperbole, I was using facts. I never post my side of an argument without facts.
But that has nothing to do with anything that was said b4 you quoted the movie. I personally do not see the connection between that movie and the fountain, and I'm pretty sure DJ feels the same way.
So, a newspaper "reporter" had the same opinion you did. Just because it was in the paper doesn't make it fact.
It is still an opinion and as such, no amount of "facts" makes you any more right or the other person any more wrong.
Goodbye MrScott
John
EvilChameleon09 said:
Ah, you see, while they were using hyperbole, I was using facts. I never post my side of an argument without facts.
The only fact you used was a location of another fountain then you stated your opinion which is as far from a fact you can get
What are you talking about? I never once quoted a newspaper reporter.
Look folks, here are the facts.
1.) Tower City fountain runs every hour on the half hour. FACT.
2.) Tower City fountain "dances" to 3 songs. FACT
3.) Tower City turns the lights off in the atrium during the show. FACT.
What is so hard to get about that?
EvilChameleon09 said:
What are you talking about? I never once quoted a newspaper reporter.Look folks, here are the facts.
1.) Tower City fountain runs every hour on the half hour. FACT.
2.) Tower City fountain "dances" to 3 songs. FACT
3.) Tower City turns the lights off in the atrium during the show. FACT.What is so hard to get about that?
so ill give you my opinion why CP is better then Tower Citys - its not located in Cleveland
None of which make you any more right, or Walt's opinion that it is "uninspiring" any less valid.
And sorry about mentioning a reporter. I figured since you could post stories about it that meant they were written by reporters. Silly me.
Goodbye MrScott
John
Coasterkyle said:
so ill give you my opinion why CP is better then Tower Citys - its not located in Cleveland
No, that is, in fact, a fact. ;)
Goodbye MrScott
John
Your #3 FACT only applies at night, when no one is there except for people walking to the baseball game or riding RTA.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=uGCkE7Yv1OU
Yeah, I'm blown away.
EvilChameleon09 said:
Ah, you see, while they were using hyperbole...
You were too:
EvilChameleon09 said:
...I don't know why these people are acting like it's the second coming of fountain christ.
I'll just assume you don't know what the term "hyperbole" means. Because you clearly don't.
Brandon
EvilChameleon09's tone has been increasingly troublesome and is no longer welcome here. This thread and the Shoot the Rapids thread provide all the proof necessary.
Finally. I have been really having to hold my tongue, so to speak. :) I try not to engage in these types of arguments.
884 Coasters, 35 States, 7 Countries
http://www.rollercoasterfreak.com My YouTube
Walt said:
EvilChameleon09's tone has been increasingly troublesome and is no longer welcome here.
Thank you sir!
I read this earlier and didn't get it until later when I read the fountain thread.
884 Coasters, 35 States, 7 Countries
http://www.rollercoasterfreak.com My YouTube
^ LOL!
He is obviously going to see to it that he is back in here. I think an apology would've been a lot easier than whatever weird CPU tricks he knows.
Well it looks as if he got banned from there too.
I wonder if even he believed half of the stuff he said?
This has brought up an interesting legal question.
PB (and CB) are privately owned sites. We (the posters) are only here by permission of Jeff and Walt(the owners).
If someone has been told to leave and had their account blocked, and then uses proxies or ip masking to defeat such mechanisms, isn't that akin to tresspassing (a misdemeanor)?
Again, I'm not sure on the legal end of it, but based on his "promises" I'm curious if he could be setting himself up for real-world consequences (beyond getting smacked with the Ban-Hamma in the virtual one).
Goodbye MrScott
John
Trespassing requires actual real estate and a physical presence of at least something, if not the person himself. The Ohio Revised Code makes that very clear, and I've never heard of any other jurisdictions extending that definition.
The path you tread is narrow, and the drop is sheer and very high.
You must be logged in to post