We have a coaster with four stations!
------------------
- John
Support Rob in theGreat DDR Challenge!
------------------
- John
Support Rob in theGreat DDR Challenge!
------------------
Dragster "Top Thrills": 0
World's first strata-coaster!
Draken_LC said:
But keep in mind that they have those 2 transfer tracks.... so they might only actually operate 4 at a time, if that.
Those transfer/storage tracks are long enough to fit all 6 trains (3 on each). MF only has one transfer/storage track and it can hold all 3 trains.
------------------
Dragster "Top Thrills": 0
World's first strata-coaster!
CWD
Thought #1: If I were designing this system (and I didn't design it, so I'm probably completely wrong) I would use a continuous launch cable with two pushers on it. So that once the thing flew down the track, the second pusher would be lined up for the next train. It wouldn't be too hard to make a launch mechanism do that. They probably didn't, but that's how I'd handle it.
Thought #2: The launch requires a whole lot of energy which is logically built up gradually during a recharge cycle. But there is no rule I can think of that would prevent the use of multiple accumulators to allow for two or more pressure systems. The idea is that a longer cycle time could be available for each of several accumulators, discharged in sequence on successive launches. The other thought about that is that if one of the systems fails, the ride could still operate on the remaining system, albeit with a longer interval between launches.
Again, mere speculation.
--Dave Althoff, Jr.
------------------
Jeff
Webmaster/GTTP - Sillynonsense.com
DELETED!
Looking at that picture, it seems to me that Xcelerator has two pressure systems. If CP installed 3 or 4 systems, you would always have at least two at rest/recharging.
------------------
I'd rather die living than live like I'm dead
--Dave Althoff, Jr.
You must be logged in to post