Griffing Airport and Cedar Point

Pete

Tuesday, December 30, 2014 11:48 PM
Pete's avatar

In a Sandusky Register article titled "What's happening at the former Griffing Airport property" they mentioned that Register staffers called Cedar Point and Grifting employees to find out what is happening with the property. Neither company returned phone calls. I wonder if Cedar Point really has plans for the property, nothing was ever announced by the park. But, maybe the Register knows something we don't. There are certainly interesting development possibilities for that property if CP were to buy it.


I'd rather be in my boat with a drink on the rocks,
than in the drink with a boat on the rocks.

+0

RCMAC

Wednesday, December 31, 2014 12:16 AM

Pete said:
... maybe the Register knows something

Sorry, but that part made me laugh...

+3

Jeff

Wednesday, December 31, 2014 12:26 AM
Jeff's avatar

I don't return their calls either. Seriously though, no one there works these two weeks.


Jeff - Advocate of Great Great Tunnels™ - Co-Publisher - PointBuzz - CoasterBuzz - Blog - Music

+1

noggin

Wednesday, December 31, 2014 12:38 AM
noggin's avatar

I rather enjoyed reading the comments on that article...

You've got EricB noting it's wishful thinking that Cedar Fair or NASA would be interested in the former airport land. I like the randomness of NASA scoping out land on Lake Erie.

You've got bchcrab95 complaining there's not enough growth in the area and that Cedar Point runs Sandusky. SunshineDaydream plays counterpoint noting how clean Cedar Fair properties are compared to the competition in the area, with one of those competitors commenting on what a good corporate citizen they really are.

+0

Sledge4cp

Wednesday, December 31, 2014 12:42 AM

Um, hello Sandusky Register, Cedar Fair staff are on their Holiday break until next week. But, once they do get your voicemail, I'm sure they'll get a good laugh and return your call and say...no comment.

But seriously, that land is so far away, I don't see what use Cedar Point/Fair could possibly have for that land.

But IF they WERE to purchase it...here is my wild idea's:

Make it another park that has say classic rides from the past (like if they were to buy the GL Big Dipper back). Only problem there is those rides would lose classic status since I am sure the lawyers would require all sorts of restraint/safety upgrades! :-( Oh and a monorail could be built.......um.....yeah have a mini Disney like thing going on in Ohio.

OR
Build something like the CIRCUS CIRCUS Adventuredome in Vegas. Thus, we could get coaster rides in during the winter!

OR

Build/Move corporate office building, build parking garage(s), and build a monorail to park enterance and around perimeter road. This will free up even more land for future park expansion.

+3

Jeff

Wednesday, December 31, 2014 12:53 AM
Jeff's avatar

Yeah, nothing is quite as inexpensive as a monorail!


Jeff - Advocate of Great Great Tunnels™ - Co-Publisher - PointBuzz - CoasterBuzz - Blog - Music

+3

Walt

Wednesday, December 31, 2014 1:08 AM
Walt's avatar

Last edited by Walt, Wednesday, December 31, 2014 1:12 AM

Walt Schmidt - Co-Publisher, PointBuzz
PointBuzz on Twitter | Facebook | YouTube
Home to the Biggest Fans of the World's Best Amusement Park

+5

Chief Wahoo

Wednesday, December 31, 2014 1:36 PM

The idea of NASA buying the airport isn't preposterous. NASA Plum Brook is not that far away on 250 and I know they have been eager to build a runway. Of course, I expect they would need something longer than what they would get over at Griffing.

I believe there were rail lines out at Plum Brook at one time...and they may have been able to connect with the lines that run through Sandusky and past Griffing. But, with Rt 6 there I don't know how the airport could really utilize those lines...even if they are still there or could be restored.

If Disney isn't going to build any more monorails I doubt that Cedar Point is going to get into that business. It is cost prohibitive, to be sure. That said, I still think Cedar Point is missing the boat on the convention business. Kalahari keeps growing so there is obviously a demand. If Cedar Fair wanted to increase their ability to make money in the off season I just think this is an opportunity that is sitting there waiting for them to act. So, a big convention hotel out there might be a nice asset for them.


"You can dream, create, design and build the most wonderful place in the world...but it requires people to make the dreams a reality."

-Walt Disney

+0

kylepark

Wednesday, December 31, 2014 2:30 PM
kylepark's avatar

I like that idea, Chief. A convention center and more upscale hotel would work very well, especially in the former airport location. The resort could operate year-round, with a new dock constructed to provide an exclusive ferry shuttle for hotel guests to CP. Perhaps a small golf course too, at least a short-hole set-up?

+0

Jeff

Wednesday, December 31, 2014 3:00 PM
Jeff's avatar

I don't think that would work well at all. It's too much stuff to build for something that is essentially seasonal.


Jeff - Advocate of Great Great Tunnels™ - Co-Publisher - PointBuzz - CoasterBuzz - Blog - Music

+0

kylepark

Wednesday, December 31, 2014 5:20 PM
kylepark's avatar

It doesn't have to be CF to buy the property, but another developer. The state built the beautiful and successful Lodge at Geneva-on-the-Lake that operates year-round: http://www.thelodgeatgeneva.com

+0

99er

Wednesday, December 31, 2014 8:14 PM
99er's avatar

Chief Wahoo said:
If Disney isn't going to build any more monorails...

Funny you say that. Rumor around here is that they are building a couple new lines to connect to Downtown Disney. I've seen construction happening that sort of looks like it could be true but it could be anything.


+0

Pete

Wednesday, December 31, 2014 8:53 PM
Pete's avatar

There are cheaper alternatives to monorails like at Disney that are available from ski lift manufacturers. These are cable driven cars (like San Francisco cable cars) that run on elevated steel tracks and operate automatically like elevators.

These are very cost effective because the supporting structure is cheap compared to monorail beams and the cars are unpowered. The systems are like gondola lifts (Sky Ride) that are supported by a steel track instead of a cable. They can run in just about any wind velocity.


I'd rather be in my boat with a drink on the rocks,
than in the drink with a boat on the rocks.

+0

Jeff

Wednesday, December 31, 2014 10:40 PM
Jeff's avatar

Disney doesn't even connect Downtown Disney Springs Island to the parks today by bus, for obvious reasons. I doubt they will any time soon.


Jeff - Advocate of Great Great Tunnels™ - Co-Publisher - PointBuzz - CoasterBuzz - Blog - Music

+0

You must be logged in to post

POP Forums app ©2025, POP World Media, LLC - Terms of Service