News: Cedar Fair proposes loan terms for purchase

Walt

Tuesday, June 27, 2006 1:11 PM
Walt's avatar

http://www.pointbuzz.com/news.htm?id=953


Walt Schmidt - Co-Publisher, PointBuzz
PointBuzz on Twitter | Facebook | YouTube
Home to the Biggest Fans of the World's Best Amusement Park

+0

MrScott

Tuesday, June 27, 2006 2:52 PM

Are they "biting off more than they can chew" to make this purchase?

MrScott


Mayor, Lighthouse Point

+0

Vince982

Tuesday, June 27, 2006 2:54 PM
Vince982's avatar

It does appear to be that way right now. I guess 2007 will be the year that Cedar Fair can show their true colours.


We'll miss you MrScott and Pete

+0

Jeff

Tuesday, June 27, 2006 3:41 PM
Jeff's avatar

You don't know what you're talking about. Borrowing money is an every day part of business. If the term is six years, that's nothing.


Jeff - Advocate of Great Great Tunnels™ - Co-Publisher - PointBuzz - CoasterBuzz - Blog - Music

+0

Ensign Smith

Tuesday, June 27, 2006 4:00 PM

Still, it makes me worry a little bit. I really would hate to see them get up to their eyeballs in debt and, should an economic downturn come, not be able to pay it off.


My author website: mgrantroberts.com.

+0

Jeff Young

Tuesday, June 27, 2006 4:04 PM

I think they'll be fine. Jeff is right, a six year term is nothing when it comes to paying back a loan. I'm actually amazed they think that they can do it that fast. You also must remember that they purchased the parks for $1.24 billion, and the rest of the $2.09 billion is, in part, to pay off debt that they had previously. Plus, with their public offering of around 10 million units of the company, they'll raise $250 million to apply directly to the debt. All of sudden, the debt is immediately only $1.75 billion. I think that they'll be fine.


Jeff Young

+0

Eleazar721

Tuesday, June 27, 2006 4:21 PM

Are they still in debt from putting coasters in almost back to back Milli, Dragster, and Wicked Twister ?

+0

Jeff Young

Tuesday, June 27, 2006 4:22 PM

No.


Jeff Young

+0

IWantBansheeBack

Tuesday, June 27, 2006 4:46 PM

Yeah, that was just a mere 59 million dollars (I think WT was 9 million; not 100% sure though). It's sick, but to them, that's nothing. And hey, don't forget about Woodstock Express!!!


Last public train of 2005 on MF!

+0

Jeff

Tuesday, June 27, 2006 4:52 PM
Jeff's avatar

Do you buy a car or a house if you can't make the payments? It's not like they're borrowing money and scratching their heads wondering if they can pay it back.


Jeff - Advocate of Great Great Tunnels™ - Co-Publisher - PointBuzz - CoasterBuzz - Blog - Music

+0

Eleazar721

Tuesday, June 27, 2006 4:58 PM

Just was asking if they had paid them off ? I have no doubt they have the resources to pay back the debt :)

+0

HeyIsntThatRob?

Tuesday, June 27, 2006 5:00 PM
HeyIsntThatRob?'s avatar

I was shocked to read that they are borrowing that much on a 6-year term. They sound pretty confident that these parks are very profitable to do that.

Think about it, that's almost purchasing one park per year!

While I don't understand how Six Flags got themselves into so much debt with a business plan to pay it back that backfired on them. I understand that both chains of parks have almost $2 billion in debt, yet CF is able to pay it off in 6 years.

Crazy.

~Rob Willi

+0

cyberdman

Tuesday, June 27, 2006 5:03 PM

The creditor investigated CF's credit worthiness just as any other bank would do the same for any joe blow trying to buy / re-finance a house, boat, car, land, etc. You have to prove it is worthwhile for an investor to invest in you.


cyberdman

+0

Joe E

Tuesday, June 27, 2006 11:16 PM
Joe E's avatar

I think Six Flags got into problems because they bought mostly small regional parks which really could not grow more than the market allowed. Then they spent a ton of money on capital expenditures expecting them to all grow into Disney overnight.

Most of CF’s debt now is on major established parks in reliable markets, which pretty much guarantees positive cash flow. It seemed most of Six Flags debt was on parks which couldn’t grow or even sustain along with the capital they were throwing in. I think the difference is CF’s 2 billion riding mostly on established parks while Six Flags debt was riding on rides trying to make established parks.

So CF’s is putting its money on the proven horse, not on long shots and giving them steroids ;)


Gemini 100- 6/11/01

+0

Gomez

Tuesday, June 27, 2006 11:24 PM
Gomez's avatar

Why is everyone getting all worried about CF turning into a new SF?


-Craig-
2008:Magnum XL-200 | Top Thrill Dragster
2007:Corkscrew | Magnum XL-200 | Maverick

+0

You must be logged in to post

POP Forums app ©2025, POP World Media, LLC - Terms of Service