What Do You Think Is Better?

Just wondering what Tower Structure you think is Better?

http://www.rcdb.com/installationgallery1574.htm?Picture=5

OR

http://www.rcdb.com/installationgallery1896.htm?Picture=21

I dont think I can tell you until #16 is finished and we know what it looks like...

you cat really tell yet because #16 is not finished but right now i think #16 is better

i like #16 better personally

So far i like the open look of the xcelerator better, but #16 isn't done so who knows what it will look like when it is done!

------------------
Wicked Twister is a great ride! Just because it looks simple soesn't mean it sucks! I wouldn't mind having it in my back yard!

Thanx for your ideas! Anymore??

I like #16's better. Looks more secure than the other one and this might be more assuring to scared riders.....of course they would pry be scared enough goin 400ft in the air. Gosh I cant wait until May :)

------------------
All Hands On Deck ;)

#16 looks nice. I do like Xcelerators too tho. #16 does look more secure but Xcelerators looked pretty sweet without any supports.

Xcelerators is way more extreme. Its the LACK of structure that I think looks insane!
------------------------
Panic Attack
FIGHT BACK
http://listen.to/panicattack

I think that #16 looks more powerful. But it also kinda has a fun "I built it myself look" It sort of looks like tinkertoys!

I like whichever structure gets the job done safely at a minimum cost. After all, I thought that was the whole goal of engineering.

If they were both the same height i like xcelerator's better beacause of the openness of the top section.

------------------
Just can't live in that negative way... Make way for the positive Day

Seeing as our beloved #16 all ready dwarfs xcelerator, I would rather have ours. No matter how they finish her off. Anything, long as you make it faster! :)

I like Xcelerators better because # 16 looks bulky, I think #16 will be a MUCH better ride ride but astheticaly Xcellerator is better

No offense, but 16 is incredibly ugly, even though it has to be that way to keep it standing. Xcellerator is sweet looking, it looks like its going to collapse in the middle which gives it style. 16 looks like hell, it is seriously ugly, and I don't mean to be a jerk, I'm giving my opinion. The ride will be good, but it is hideous. It can't look like Xcellerator though, so it's not a big deal. No matter how ugly I'll still ride, and by the way it's going to dominate the park...

I like the open-look better, but it's not like I won't ride #16. I can't wait till' May!!!!!! Just think, living one more boaring day = 1 more day closer to opening day of #16!!!!
*** This post was edited by Dragster03 11/27/2002 11:15:00 AM ***

I agree that #16 is a ugly structure. It just doesn't seem to fit in with the curved lines of other roller coasters found in the park. If it was like xcelerator it would fit in better, but due to its massive size it can't be.

------------------
GTTP is my favorite website!

16 looks like a bunch of toothpicks glued together. I would say that (disregarding the height) Xcel looks much safer because the track is "cradled" inside the support structure. And with 16 its just kinda out there, just held on with some sticks. I for one am excited to see how much this tower sways all the way up there. Watching Xcel sway was kinda creepy because both support structures moved back and forth causing the entire tophat to lean back and forth crating a wierd visual.

And whats with the yellow? If you're going to have a structure that large dont paint it "eye-sore yellow", paint it something a bit more atractive...

------------------
Can Food Drive?

It's not an eye sore...it's meant to be highly visible from everywhere inside(and outside) the park. What color would you rather have the tower be? Generally, I don't like the color yellow, but it looks good on the tower...even better in person, in my opinion.

------------------
Launch: Tophat: Twistage: Brakes...

...Denial is an ugly thing.