I still think that if the first free-falls were built in the midst of the coaster wars this past decade that they would be considered coasters. They are full circuit, they have a lift, they run primarily with gravity, and they run on rails...why is it not considered a coaster?
-------------
MF count: 23
*** This post was edited by CP_bound on 2/11/2002. ***
And besides, Magic Mountain is on their own. In 1999, they said that Superman was the tallest coaster in the world. In 2000, they said Goliath was. Go figure.
-----------------
Jeff
Webmaster/GTTP, Sillynonsense.com
"As far as I can tell it doesn't matter who you are. If you can believe, there's something worth fighting for..." - Garbage, "Parade"
*** This post was edited by Ralph Wiggum on 2/11/2002. ***
-----------------
Jeff
Webmaster/GTTP, Sillynonsense.com
"As far as I can tell it doesn't matter who you are. If you can believe, there's something worth fighting for..." - Garbage, "Parade"
I would argue that S:UE, V2, and WT are all coasters but S:TE is not, its simple really, S:TE doesn't have a train, performs no more maneuvers then forward and backwards.
Impulses all have lateral movement as well and articulated trains. Reverse Free Falls have nothing more then rocket sleds for cars, in essence a reverse Demon drop nothign more at all.
Guinness says that the fastest roller coaster is Superman: The Escape. Therefore, Guinness considers it a roller coaster. They do make the distinction that Dodonpa, the new S&S Thrust Air in Japan, is the fastest complete-circuit coaster.
Cedar Point will have to settle for a tie. Sorry, that's just the way it is. Now if they want to talk about the most complete-circuit coasters, they've got a lock on that one without question.
-----------------
Jeff
Webmaster/GTTP, Sillynonsense.com
"As far as I can tell it doesn't matter who you are. If you can believe, there's something worth fighting for..." - Garbage, "Parade"
Magnum Force said:
Anyway it makes absolutely no difference whatsoever I just question why first generation freefalls aren't considered coasters if S:TE is.
Ok, here's one for you.
S:TE uses a vehicle that rolls along a track where the riders are facing a direction that is parallel to the direction they're moving (forwards/backwards). At no point do the 1st generation freefalls ever have their riders face in a direction parallel to the motion of the ride, and the cages don't even remotely resemble vehicles. So even though they DO use a track of sorts, they're not "roller coasters".
There, how's that? ;)
-------------
--Greg
My Home
MF count: 52
-----------------
YES! No more full time trash work!
Witches' Wheel triangle - 2002
Magnum Force said:
You need one or the other Jeff, S:TE has neither lateral movement nor an articulated train, Wildcat has lateral movement but no articulated train, Linear Gale has an articulated train but no lateral movemt, see what I am getting at?
This makes the most sense out of anything out there. I'm sticking with this explanation... Good job, Magnum! :)
-------------
MF count: 23
Magnum Force said:
"You need one or the other Jeff, S:TE has neither lateral movement nor an articulated train"
So if instead of releasing from the station straight into the "magnet" area, a reverse-freefall coaster did, say, a 90 degree right hand turn (at a slow speed mind you), resulting in *some* lateral movement; THAT would be enough for you to quantify it as a coaster?
It seems to me like you have carefully crafted your narrow definition with the express intent of excluding S:TE. For example, take out the barrel rolls on Ultra-Twister @ SFAW; would it then NOT be a coaster (it'd be incredibly lame, but still a coaster).
Personally, I'm still a big believer in the "Duck Test". If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, quacks like a duck, then it must be a duck!
jeremy
--"Things look bad for Mr. Quackers..."
You must be logged in to post