Gerg said:
The same restraints as Millennium Force.------------------
blasting off in 112 days...........No, the restraints were redesigned for Intamin's giga coaster trains after the perilous plunge incident. Its a much moure massive restraint, and you can hardly move your legs around, and making the length of your body above the restraint 1" more is impossible if you're properly stapled. The design change is very visable between Perilous Plunge and Xcelerator, they're only 100 feet away so its easy to see. They need to make the lap belts a bit longer than Xcelerators, otherwise MANY of you will be disappointed when you don't get to ride because your waist is larger than 38".
If your head exceeds the head rest, you will not be allowed to ride. I'm talking like 80% of your skull being over the headrest. Not too many people are this tall, but I'm sure theres someone on GTTP who is. Unless tey make the backrow's higher.
------------------
MANTIS ROCKS 2002
of stuff in my life I rode MF on my 60th 3 times.I hope they at least place a seat out front like Raptor has so I or anybody else standing in line won't be disapointed
If Iwas offered a ride in a jet fighter right now Iwould gojust becauseI want toI' m that confident
BUT I may have to sit down for while afterward:)
------------------
I'm not an old fogey, I'm just an old coaster rider..
Remeber, just E-mail CP and say you are soooo anxious to ride but you're concerned you may not fit. Ask what having a 3 inch longer seatbelt would do. BTW, theres a big difference between airtime on Millenium force and airtime on these rocket coasters. Xcelerator is negative 2.2 Gs at the top, which mean the lap bar has about 350 LBS pushing it up.
If you think that you are too large, my only advice is Atkin's diet. If you can stick to it, you'll lose the inches.
------------------
What is most anticipated event of 2003? the debut of Dragster, the release of Metallica's new album, the release of Terminator 3, or the release of Matrix:Reloaded...tough call.
speedy said:
The park really needs to invest in some seat belt extenders. That would be the optimal solution for EVERYONES safety.
No, that would defeat the purpose of the belts being short in the first place. The belts are meant to be the final test of whether or not the restraint can hold people. The thinking goes (however conservative it might be), that if the belt doesn't fit you may be too big around to be safely restrained.
------------------
Jeff
Webmaster/GTTP - Sillynonsense.com
DELETED!
--Dave Althoff, Jr.
Who thinks T-shaped lap bars might not be such a good idea
Jeff said:
speedy said:
The park really needs to invest in some seat belt extenders. That would be the optimal solution for EVERYONES safety.No, that would defeat the purpose of the belts being short in the first place. The belts are meant to be the final test of whether or not the restraint can hold people. The thinking goes (however conservative it might be), that if the belt doesn't fit you may be too big around to be safely restrained.
------------------
Jeff
Webmaster/GTTP - Sillynonsense.com
DELETED!
Yeah, but the belts on Xcelerator are RIDICULOUSLY short. A LOT of people here are not going to fit.
Dave: I think your fears have been addressed if the Xcelerator trains are any indication. Can't say I've been on it, but they look to be less of a ball buster than the MF bars, which have straight columns.
------------------
Jeff
Webmaster/GTTP - Sillynonsense.com
DELETED!
------------------
I'm not an old fogey, I'm just an old coaster rider..
You must be logged in to post