I could be wrong, but I think the primary reason for the cable lift is due to the steep lift hill on Millennium Force. They needed a better way to fit a lift hill in a smaller space and a cable lift was more practical.
Leviathan looks to have a traditional B&M ascent and is not quite as steep, allowing a chain to be more practical in some way. I don't know if there is some concern with the amount of force put on a chain with steeper hills that made them turn to a cable lift for MF or what, because Fahrenheit at Hershey uses some kind of a double chain mechanism for its 90 degree lift, yet it has much smaller trains.
It's only a speed issue. Do you think the weight of the chain would matter relative to the weight of the train?
Jeff - Advocate of Great Great Tunnels™ - Co-Publisher - PointBuzz - CoasterBuzz - Blog - Music
If I did not forget all my statics:
If the train weighed something like 10,000lbs lets say on a 30* lift hill, the chain itself would only be 'responsible' for around 5,000lbs of weight, ignoring friction. The rest would transfer into the structure of the lift-hill.
Switching to a 45* lift would increase the chain load up to about 7071 lbs, an increase of approx 42%.
Additionally, going to a 55* lift would increase to 8192 lbs. And of course, 90* the full load on the chain of 10,000 lbs.
B&M has been using steeper lifts for some time now. The cable lift is mainly for speed. Lift motors are more high-torque then anything, not built for speed.
-Steve
You must be logged in to post