I heard this somewhere too....hmmm?
But another bit of history on Magnum was that it was announced in October 1988 and listed in a 1989 park brochure at only 201 feet tall versus the 205 foot tall statistic seen today. The 201 foot statistic came from the rides blueprints and did not include the height of the footers. Interesting, eh?
-Adam G- The OG Dragster nut
Yes, because especially before they were using computers to design these things, you can just instantly change the entire design and recalculate all of physics of the ride instantly, just like RCT!
Jeff - Advocate of Great Great Tunnels™ - Co-Publisher - PointBuzz - CoasterBuzz - Blog - Music
I seem to remember hearing something like this 'legend.' Arrow's orginal plans called for the first hill to be around 180 ft. and a 50 degree drop. When the plans were reviewed by the park's staff they thought going the extra 20 feet would help market the ride. To make the ride fit the degree of drop had to be bumped up to 60 degrees... all this long before construction took place, not "last minute." That is just coming off the top of my head, but I'm pretty I read this in an interview with Kinzel around '99 when the park was all up on celebrating Magnum's 10 years.
I have read it as well in a book some time ago. While I can't remember the name of the book, it did mention Magnum was originally going to be about 180 feet tall. This was during the premature stages in planning, way long before the first shovel hit the ground.
*** Edited 7/26/2005 11:14:43 AM UTC by kylepark***
- Uncle Jay
I remember all this as well:
After seeing BANDIT open in Japan, Kinzel contacted ACE and asked if a non-looping steel coaster would go over in the U.S.
Once Arrow had a design, they showed it to the board of directors. It was going to be 180+ feet tall. Slightly taller than the GREAT AMERICAN SCREAM MACHINE that Arrow was going to build in Six Flags Great Adventure. Then the question came up: "How much with it cost to break the 200 ft barrier?"
I wish I could remember where I read it. I want to say it was an interview with Kinzel in Rollercoaster magazine from ACE. I will try to look for my old issues and see if I can find it.
It seems like it could make sense. Plans do change. Although the physics, depending on how the ride was planned, may not have changed all the much. The forces I can see changing and the next hill height being bumped up a little bit. But it wouldn't be to severe. Would it?
And $10,000 for a coaster?! Some of my bigger creations are up in the $30,000-$50,000 range. And did anyone else recreate a TTD to their best ability and it be a less intense ride?
"Ive got the need, the need for speed!"
You must be logged in to post