If it was a long ride at 120mph, I would think that they would have to shut down the ride during rain, or otherwise enclose the train, or something.
------------------
Launch: Tophat: Twistage: Brakes...
...Denial is an ugly thing.
------------------
- Dennis
Comparing MF and "Dragster", if you get through the first two drops on MF without getting hit, the ride would be over if you were riding "Dragster," but on MF, you still have a chance of getting hit on the island, and turnarounds. The short ride time minimizes the chance of getting hit by something at high speeds because there are only two portions on the ride that this could happen. Do you get what I'm saying?
All of this isn't to say that people won't get hit, because I'm sure it will be a normal occurence as with MF.
The proposed 750 ft. fish-hook coaster that was to be mounted on the side of the Stratosphere in Las Vegas was slated to have enclosed trains. These plans fell through because they couldn't get it past the city council or something like that.
------------------
Launch: Tophat: Twistage: Brakes...
...Denial is an ugly thing.
yummy:)
------------------
I'm not an old fogey, I'm just an old coaster rider..
MillenniumForce said:
Hmmm.... enclosed trains. Very interesting. Are there any coasters with enclosed trains (not an indoor coaster but an enclosed train)? That would be VERY intersesting...
------------------
My top 5 roller coasters:
5.)Mantis 4.)Raptor 3.)S:Ros @ SFDL 2.)Wicked Twister 1.) Millennium Force
Although it has nothing to do with anything, Stratosphere's proposed Arrow fishhook was designed to have encloded cars.
This isn't much of a surprise at the ride was going to be 740 feet tall (at first)
------------------
--Dingo 65--
http://rct.ogresnet.com
------------------
Launch: Tophat: Twistage: Brakes...
...Denial is an ugly thing.
How true, how true...are you related to John Madden by any chance?
*** This post was edited by G-Money 11/16/2002 4:23:36 PM ***
------------------
"Too weird to live, too rare to die."
but, It doesnt matter how long the ride is...if there is a chance of getting hit for one second or for 2 minutes, there is still a chance and somebody will get injured sometime.
------------------
- Dennis
As far as protecting your face, I think that if there is a windshield, a la Dodonpa or a convertible, that could certainly keep the faces and bodies of the riders safe. As far as putting your hands up, I think that most parks make it clear that you are doing so at your own risk.
-albert
**edited year of silver streak
*** This post was edited by alviolin 11/16/2002 6:49:58 PM ***
It did make me think long and hard about the merits of sitting in the back of the train, although it is a superb ride. I would guess the back seat on #16 will be awesome, since there will be great airtime over the tophat - but getting hit by some idiot's unsecured junk is going to be a real risk, particularly with the twists on the way down.
Next time round, I got back into the same seat, though !
------------------
Steve
"Will all those who expressed disappointment at the new ride please leave the park now"
*** This post was edited by Panman 11/17/2002 6:49:52 PM ***
------------------
If the roller coaster scared you...
RIDE IT AGAIN!!!
------------------
House of Tomorrow: Only technology makes live worth living
And to keep from getting crap in my eyes, I always wear my sunglasses when I ride (regardless of if the ride operators tell me I ought not). I've never lost a pair of sunglasses on any ride I've been on.
*** This post was edited by tremor 11/18/2002 10:21:58 AM ***
You must be logged in to post