------------------
Michael McCormack
Magnum Count: 933
"Is it raining nickels?"
------------------
-Evan
Admissions GLP 04
------------------
Jeff - Webmaster - GTTP - My Blog
Blogs, photo albums - CampusFish
What time does the water show start?
I do hope though, that the maturity of the average guest increases. If the kids are mature enough not to need baby sitting, they are fine with me. Too bad too many aren't.
-Sam
------------------
Avalanche Run - My first Roller Coaster.
Magnum XL-200 - The BEST Roller Coaster!
------------------
http://www.geaugalake.tk
GL is a local park easily accesible by neighboring highly populated areas. Accompanied by the amount of kids that are there with their families, it is a kid haven!
Like said before this park has always been a day care with ride. Just the way it is. But getting rid of the circle would also mean getting rid of the hotel shuttle drop off and pick which could also be bad for business.
Best thing I ever saw was I got off work early one day around 8pm and went to Subway across the street to see about 10 tow trucks(the big flatbed kind that can hold 2 cars) towing cars left and right out of the shopping center lot and people running from the park trying to get to their cars in time. Great, I loved it.
------------------
GL rides sup 2004
"The Fun is Back!"
------------------
http://www.geaugalake.tk
Back on topic here, I'm pretty sure GL can create an access point for shuttle busses to enter the parking lot, if they remove the drop off area.
*** This post was edited by shaggszgn 4/15/2004 5:52:28 PM ***
-Matt
2001 Magnum Crew
2003 Magnum Crew
2004 Magnum ATL
SFWoARules! said:
Correct me if I am wrong, but I though CP had some sort of 'drop-off' policy where you did not have to pay for parking if you got in and out of the parking lot in under a half hour.------------------
http://www.geaugalake.tk
Yeah? And your point?
------------------
"Hmm. . .we don't have anything like that. . .but I can give you this comment card."
XFlight said: But getting rid of the circle would also mean getting rid of the hotel shuttle drop off and pick which could also be bad for business.
The shuttles could enter through the park's regular driveway though and perhaps have a reserved turnaround area near where the old crosswalk is (the six flag pole plaza), or it could just enter Geauga Lake Road by Villain and pick up on that side of the crosswalk. It wouldn'y take long to fill in and pave over the ditch on the one side of the road to make a nice turnaround section.
------------------
-Evan
Admissions GLP 04
MDOmnis said:
But if they can shell out $99 to visit GL AND CP, that might be a different story.
For peope like me any you, that would be an awesome deal. But others might think otherwise. There are those GP that want only to attend GL and not CP. To them that's a $40 increase. That's a pretty big blow. A good example is my mom. She won't shell out $99 for a GL season pass, and she dosen't care for CP that mcuh(mainly because of the drive and the extra charge waterpark). I'm pretty sure many others will feel the same way. Besides, how many GL season pass holders will take full adventage of the GL/CP offering? I say about half, if that.
IMO, they want to keep the season pass sales up, or even increase there sales, they should offer two types of passes. Say $60-$70 for a GL pass, that could include all CF parks except CP, but a GL pass only would do. Then you can have the option to upgrade your pass for say $20-$30 more to include CP. That way everyone is happy, and CF can make a killing by offering two types of passes.
CP+ nonGL CF parks: 105 (expect an increase)
GL only: 59
Chainwide ride park only (bought at either park): 125
Soak city would be a $50 (or $55) add on to either CP pass, and JCC would continue to be a CP-specific add-on as well.
But, I think they park is doing the right thing by taking their time to figure this out---I'd expect to see plenty of "would you consder $X a good value for a season pass to both parks" questions on this year's in-park surveys at both parks.
SFWoARules! said:
There are a lot of people that still park in the shopping center and jump Aurora Road.
So, why can't the park close off the park to just automobile access? And maybe make a "no walking onto the property" policy. Sure it would deter some people, but they're trying to get around the parking fees anyway. Perhaps a parking pass would help alieve the situation a bit for those who park accross the street.
------------------
Michael McCormack
Magnum Count: 933
"Is it raining nickels?"
You must be logged in to postArchived.