If I remember correctly Cedar Point is almost always named "Capacity King." Why would Cedar Point put in a ride that has very bad capacity? Also, Cedar Point has always spoke out against shuttle (coasters, depends on how you feel) rides. Will Cedar Point consider this to be #15 on the coaster list or put it in the same category as Power Tower?
If it turns out that an Impulse is indeed going in, I will be very surprised. What does everyone else think?
-----------------
MF Laps: 2
Raptor Laps: 3
Magnum Laps: 2
Power Tower Launches: 1
Power Tower Drops: 1
*** This post was edited by Joe E. on 10/31/2001. ***
Capacity isn't a problem at CP. Its all in your staff. You can't compare CP's to any SF park. That is the biggest thing w/ capacity... people who know how to work their ride!
-----------------
"Your obssesed w/ that place aren't you?"
Also consider that an Impulse might have better capacity with a longer train, more ride ops, and a crew that actually knows what the hell is going on (coughSUEcough). You won't see them napping between dispatches or taking their time to get everyone checked and strapped in.
I'm going to shoot for a theoretical capacity of 600 pph.
-----------------
Jeff
Webmaster/GTTP
"As far as I can tell it doesn't matter who you are. If you can believe, there's something worth fighting for..." - Garbage, "Parade"
*** This post was edited by Jeff on 10/31/2001. ***
*** This post was edited by net on 11/1/2001. ***
However, it won't just be a SUE clone anyway ;)
-----------------
--Greg
My Home
MF count: 52
-------------
I'd rather die living than live like I'm dead
I've held all along that shuttles are coasters. A distinction just needs to be made between full-circuit and shuttle. For example, I think the tallest full-circuit coaster is a more prestigious acquisition than the tallest shuttle.
Last year and this year, we visited SFWoA. Our wait time for SUE was about 30 min. The line started inside the station.
Six Flags Great America is my home park and Vertical Velocity's lines have improved greatly over the season once most of the bugs were worked out.
In Sept., we visited SFGam and walked by V2. The queue line was full and wrapped around the resturant next door.
We figured 1 1/2 hour wait. We were on and off the ride in 45 min. with FastLane being used by other people from time to time! Average dispatch times were about 2 min.
Like everyone has been saying, a great crew is the most important thing for capacity. SFGAm showed this in its operation of V2. It also helped the the ride was behaving that day!/P
*** This post was edited by Snake Oil Elxir on 11/1/2001. ***
*** This post was edited by Snake Oil Elxir on 11/1/2001. ***
Jeff said:
I'm going to shoot for a theoretical capacity of 600 pph.
Huh? The CP version? 600 pph will not cut it for a brand new CP attraction. Aren't the Magnum, MF, and Raptor all over 1000 pph? I certainly hope the new ride has a bigger capacity than 600 pph. Now if there is two towers............(I like Garbage, too!)
*** This post was edited by Craig the Coaster Freak on 11/1/2001. ***
For what it's worth, I consider both rides to be rollercoasters, but that is beside the point. Somebody could easily justify calling one a coaster without calling the other one a coaster.
-----------------
Jeff
Webmaster/GTTP
"As far as I can tell it doesn't matter who you are. If you can believe, there's something worth fighting for..." - Garbage, "Parade"
You must be logged in to post