Cedar Point cuts pay

Here's the Sandusky Register article.

Register: While pay for new hires at Cedar Point continued to fall post-COVID, employees hired under the legacy pay structure have continued to receive the hourly bonus if they returned each year up through the 2024 season.

This month, however, returning employees hired under legacy pay have been notified that the $5-per-hour pay bump is going away.

Welp, it's going to be interesting too see how staffing levels play out. Might not have a huge effect.

djDaemon's avatar

I guess it depends on how many people hired in 2020 had planned on returning this year, and of those how many won't return for less pay. I would imagine the first group is not particularly large, which would mean the latter group is pretty small.

So, while I would not expect a further deterioration of staffing quality, they sure don't seem interested in improving staffing quality, which is disappointing. Personally, I'd happily pay a fair bit more to get into the park if the experience were improved via better operations.


Brandon

GL2CP's avatar

These damn seasonal workers living high in their plaster towers earning nickels upon nickels while the rest of us look on from the sidelines wondering when it’ll be our turn. I won’t stand for this. Cut their pay 30% more.


First ride; Magnum 1994

I guess this means Toots Sweets won't be open for soft serve at 10:05am on Opening Day.

djDaemon's avatar

Also worth noting - simply maintaining inflation parity with $15/hr in 2020 would require $18.36/hr this season. maintaining parity with $20/hr in 2020 would mean paying $24.50 this season. So $15/hr this season is the equivalent of a ~39% pay cut relative to $20/hr in 2020, and an ~18% cut relative to $15/hr. That's pretty terrible.

So I'll revise my previous comment - I would expect a decrease in staff quality, and therefore worse operations throughout the park.

I hope to be wrong, of course, but management philosophy like this seems like a race for the bottom.


Brandon

Business is business. The only thing that matters is profit and accountability to investors. They do not care if the quality of the park and it's services are bad unless the profits go down. If people still come and use their product and spend their money on the product. Why would you want to put more money into it?

Kevinj's avatar

Made nearly $20/hour at a part time job (a running store) in Columbus...way back....

Of course they aren't a publicly traded company, but damn that's longer ago than I want to think about and there were no "added expenses" being grifted from my paycheck.

As much as I have loved the park over the years, I can't imagine any potential employee who would also have to pay rent, buy food, etc. in what consistently sounds like crappy living situations finding that wage appealing enough to work there.

Unless your goal was to simply work at Cedar Point (I can see plenty finding that job fun) and not, you know, actually make money. I've heard plenty of awesome stories of great experiences from those of you who have worked there. Only person outside of this realm who I knew worked there went to my school and headlined a couple shows in Live-E in the 90's. She loved the opportunity it gave her (went on to sing on a cruise-line and then actually stayed in the music business), but absolutely hated living there. Just used it as a stepping stone to more musical opportunities.

I suppose it's borderline appealing if you live close enough that you don't actually have to live there and all that extra expense.

Definitely not a good PR headline during the time that college students are thinking about summer jobs.

Last edited by Kevinj,

Promoter of fog.

You get what you pay for, whether it be an employee, a service or merchandise. For the most part the better the wage and benefits, the better the employee, the better the service. The better the service the more you enjoy your best day ever.

You must be logged in to post

POP Forums app ©2025, POP World Media, LLC - Terms of Service