My motto:"If you can't live life on the edge, kill yourself."
Aaron
------------------
17 straight years of real thrills and counting...
TekGuy said:
In order for the brakes to fail, the magnets would have to either fall off the track or the trains. I'd imagine that even if one or two magnets were to come off or fail in some manner, that the train would either stop as required or at least slow down to non-lethal speeds.Aaron
------------------
17 straight years of real thrills and counting...
I agree, this is not like most coasters. The breaks are magnets. Regular breaks could fail, magnets won't fail.
------------------
magnumdan
magnum count: 2233
------------------
17 straight years of real thrills and counting...
------------------
June 11th, 2001 - Gemini 100
VertiGo Rides - 82
Technical Services 2002
Fright Zone Screamster 2002
------------------
Six Flags: The AOL of Theme parks...
------------------
2005: Ride Operator
2006: General Manager
My track record
------------------
What is most anticipated event of 2003? the debut of Dragster, the release of Metallica's new album, the release of Terminator 3, or the release of Matrix:Reloaded...tough call.
------------------
June 11th, 2001 - Gemini 100
VertiGo Rides - 82
Technical Services 2002
Fright Zone Screamster 2002
------------------
520, 500+, 160. prepare.
When generators turn, a coil turns inside of a magnetic feild produced by a permanet magnet induces electicity into the wire. When you load that copper wire down, there is more resistance against the coil putting more load on the mechanisim that is turning the coil.
Magnetic brakes induces a current into the copper fins with the earth magnents and the movement of the trains. The faster the train is moving the more current is produced, and more resistance the magnitized copper fins push against the earth magnets. As the speed doubles, the amount of force it takes to stop the train quadruples. The same holds true for the magnetic brakes, except they can't actully stop the train from moving if the train is on a downhill slope. The reason for this is the magnetic field gets very weak. If the slope is greater, the minimum speed is faster.
Permanet brakes are fail-safe, because they lack moving parts. The brakes on the launch are normaly up, but the system has to pull them down before launch. Also, as the train passes they go back up. This way, it is much more likely that the brakes will go up during the launch and stop the train, than they are staying down. I assume that the computer uses latter logic or something simular. What that means basicly is two computers have to agree on what ride will be doing. If the computers don't agree, the ride won't run. A lot of breakdowns are caused by the computers sensing false situations, such as a phantom train. It is always better that the computer sees false situation than not see a real one.
------------------
Millennium Force 03'
Roller coasters are one of the most redundantly checked machine. They are very dangerous machines if not respected. When it comes to running rides, parks don't take chances with safety. The majority of the time and effort put into engineering Top Thrill Dragster went into making it extremely safe for everyone that rides it.
Spryboy said:
Well, if the launch-side brakes get stuck in the "on" position for whatever reason (hey, it could happen), I sure hope there are a couple of redundant kill-switches the operators can hit...
We;;, on Xcelerator's brakerun, if the mechanics find a specific fin that won't pop up, they'll keep it up. The odds of having all 120 or so fins fail at the same moment, and remain down is just about 0.
------------------
What is most anticipated event of 2003? the debut of Dragster, the release of Metallica's new album, the release of Terminator 3, or the release of Matrix:Reloaded...tough call.
You must be logged in to post