B&M didn't really stop building them, as they are still offered on their website, it is just that no parks have ordered one recently.
Reasons for this are speculated on, but it probably comes down to the train design being a gimmick of sorts, and all of the parks that could benefit from that style of coaster already have one.
R.I.P. Mr. Scott
I have no concrete evidence as to why, but I would venture a guess that it is due to lack of demand.....
I'm pretty sure they are still shown on the B&M website, so if a park wanted one, I don't see why they couldn't buy one.....just not sure why they would want one.....
Nick
The popularity of B&M's Stand Ups really waned at the turn of the millennium. I suspect that the designs were getting too intricate and twisty to really be enjoyable to the general public. Mantis is fun, but really intense and headbangy in spots. B&M's real winners are their hypers, inverts, and floorlesses which are generally smoother and more re-rideable.
Yeah, I'd take King Cobra any day over Mantis. I don't understand why it left KI. It took up a small footprint and was always popular.
I guess I do remember it being down alot, so probably removed for maintenance reasons?
Anyway, this thread speaks volumes about why no more B&M Stand-Ups are being built...B&M has better options, with much higher rider satisfaction. I always wonder if Mantis had been an out-and-back coaster with very long, gradual cobra rolls, air time hills, and a loop...would it have been more of a hit? It seems like the really twisty, flippy, high-force elements are what killed these rides...they just didn't translate well to a stand-up.
You must be logged in to post