(DISCLAIMER: This is a "What do you think?" thread, not an "experts tell all thread")
------------------
2005: Ride Operator
2006: General Manager
My track record
1989 (2 years) 1991 (3 years) 1994 (2 years) 1996 (4 years) 2000 (2 years) 2002 (1 year) 2003 ... not including the transformation of Avalanche Run to Disaster Transport.
Notice that coasters have opened in both odd and even years.
------------------
Virtual Midway
http://www.virtualmidway.com
1989 - new coaster
(1 year)
1990 - transform coaster
(1 year)
1991 - new coaster
(2 years)
1993 - new water ride
(1 year)
1994 - new coaster
(2 years)
1996 - new coaster
(2 years)
1998 - new ride
(1 year)
1999 - Camp Snoopy
(1 year)
2000 - new coaster
(1 year)
2002 - new coaster
(1 year)
2003 - new coaster
And that's not including major expansions to Soak City, the resorts, etc and the millions upon millions spent on those things. The point remains - there is no pattern of a 2-year plan. Cedar Point researches and make decisions based on many factors. As history has shown, they are not afraid to make major improvements in back to back years.
------------------
Virtual Midway
http://www.virtualmidway.com
They consulted the project with several manufacturers. Intamin is the obvious one, and probably B&M, morgan, and/or arrow. You probably would think Intamin wouldn't have been their choice consitering there history at that point. The manufacturers threw their cards on the table. Intamin had an elevator lift system which let them build taller on the releitivly small plot of land. In Cedar Points case, Intamins design was the best.
Millennium Force was a special case. They knew what year they wanted it to open on. In other cases, it can be driven off of the timeframe, like in Top Thrill Dragster's case.
Cedar Point started talking about going higher in 2000. They had a great experince with Intamin with MF, so they went back to them about going taller and faster. I think they soon came to realize a lift-coast roller coaster wasn't a possibility.
Then they started talking about a launched roller coaster. Intamin probably was already thinking about a more powerful launch at that time. Intamin designed and built a test model of the launch. This proved to Cedar Point that it could be done. I guess that they built Xcelerator as a 'bug tester' so they could work out the bugs before they got TTD up. Xcelerator is a big success in many ways.
Cedar Point plans on a technology and return on investment basis. If the techology is there, and it will prove to be a good investment, it works itself out.
What will the next recored breaker be? I really doubt Cedar Point is worried about that, and neither should you be. :)
Note: this post, and most of my posts may sound like I'm talking like an 'expert;' however they are opinions deduced from many sorces such as official interviews or statements, observations, and other opinions with integrity.
------------------
One Man, One Mission, One Thought To Save The World.
Camp Snoopy 2000-2002
Mean Streak 2003
------------------
What is most anticipated event of 2003? the debut of Dragster, the release of Metallica's new album, the release of Terminator 3, or the release of Matrix:Reloaded...tough call.
------------------
The InCrowd™
http://www.theincrowd.tk
You must be logged in to post